
[Sponsors] 
November 18, 2012, 02:00 
(Help!) Rotor Blade CFD

#1 
New Member
zhangjian
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 6 
I wrote a simple code to compute the rotor flowfield. I give the inlet B.C. a total pressure and a total temperature, the outlet BC a back pressure. But it does not converge. So i have several questions:
1、Is the boundary conditons ok? How to treat the reverse flow? 2、How to initialize before the calculation? 3、How about the numerical schemes? I use Roe flux average for space and LUSGS for time. 

November 18, 2012, 05:42 

#2 
Member

Hi,
Are you simulating a whole cascade of rotor blades? The boundary conditions are ok. But how do you determine the back pressure? Th whole flow is reversing at outlet or just some faces? Inappropriate values for back pressure results in reversed flow. For initializing the calculation use the Mach number. determine the inlet velocity and calculate the dynamic pressure and static pressure (Ps=P0Pv). set the static pressure for an initial guess for the inlet boundary and use the outlet pressure for initializing the outlet boundary. For better results you can also add Vanlees's Flux splitting scheme for flux vectors. To prevent the oscillatory behavior of the numerical results you can add the VanLeer's limiter to the flux splitting algorithm. Regards. 

November 20, 2012, 00:39 
Is it axial/centrifugal turbomachinery rotor blade or helicopter rotor blade

#3 
Member
A. S.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Raipur (INDIA)
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 10 
Hi
The problem you are attempting is turbomachinery or helicopter rotor. Also in case of turbomachinery is it a compressor rotor or turbine rotor After that may be help you Apoorv 

November 20, 2012, 04:39 

#4 
Member
Shenren Xu
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London, U.K.
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8 

November 20, 2012, 05:46 
It makes difference in stablity

#5 
Member
A. S.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Raipur (INDIA)
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 10 
Hi,
If compressor it will work against pressure, turbine it has favourable pressure gradient. My tactics to handle both of them is different. Regards Apurva 

November 21, 2012, 01:10 

#6 
New Member
zhangjian
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 6 
Thank u first! My case is very simple, it has only one blade. It is from the FLUENT tutorial "mixing plane" case. I cut the mesh by half, so I got its rotor mesh. I think the outlet is too close to the rotor, so the backflow occurs. I tried some methods from FLUENT to prevent the reverse flow, for example, make the backflow normal to the boundary and set the back pressure as the total pressure at the outlet. The solution is better, but not as well as the result from FLUENT. So are there some other tips?


November 21, 2012, 01:12 

#7 
New Member
zhangjian
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 6 

November 21, 2012, 01:52 

#8 
Member
A. S.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Raipur (INDIA)
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 10 
Hi
Have domain down stream the rotor atleast 50% of chord in case of isolated rotor. In case of compressor rotor, I will prefer to ramp up the backpressure from a reasonable low value to target value (final pressure) in 200300 iteration for stability. Also don't start with zero initial velocity. You can give velocity in axial flow direction say 100 m/s and start. Hope this is helpful. Apoorv 

November 21, 2012, 02:04 

#9  
Member

Quote:


November 22, 2012, 07:36 

#10  
New Member
zhangjian
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 6 
Thanks a lot! That's helpful. The distance is just 50% or less of the chord, so that's the problem. But i'm wandering how commercial softwares deal with the backflow. For example, the fluent user's guide just tell us how to set the condition, but didn't tells us their implementation details.....
Quote:


November 22, 2012, 07:57 

#11  
New Member
zhangjian
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 6 
Yes, you are right! And my final goal is to simulate multistage compressor. But now the work just begin. I'am not quite familiar with it. So I want to start with a simple rotor. I read some paper, some use absolute variables in the govering equation relative system for convenience(e.g the message change between rotor and stator is easy). But the Inviscid flux term is different(add some terms), and the source term is no longer zero. Questions come, I don't know how to Implement the Space discretization. Because the Roe average matrix is different now, or for Van Leer spiliting the eigenvalues are changed?. And what about the turbulence model in the rotational system? Due to these problems, my code may have some mistakes......
Quote:


November 22, 2012, 08:55 

#12 
Member

The idea of Roe consist of determining the solution by solving a modified equation, where the flux vector E is quasilinearized by introducing a matrix A and adopting :
E=AQ where Q is the unkown vector. the description of governing equation is though and I do not recall them very well, but I can suggest you to look at "computational fluid dynamics for engineers" by "Hoffman". you can find the method conditions and the matrix form of VanLeer's flux splitting vectors for two dimensional studies. You can also consider the BaldwinLomax turbulent model. Since the flow in through a turbine or compressor is very complex, the calculation of shear layer thickness in a CFD code is difficult. Hence, using the BL model is more easier since it is a zeroequation model. Further explanation about this model could be found at this article: Granville,P. S., "BaldwinLomax factors for turbulent boundary layers in pressure gradients", AIAA Journal. http://www.cfdonline.com/Wiki/BaldwinLomax_model 

November 22, 2012, 10:18 

#13  
New Member
zhangjian
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 6 
Thanks a lot!!!
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
STARWorks : Mainstream CAD with CFD  CD adapco Group Marketing  CDadapco  0  February 13, 2002 13:23 
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001  John C. Chien  Main CFD Forum  36  January 24, 2001 22:10 
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001  Chris R. Kleijn  Main CFD Forum  0  August 21, 2000 04:49 
Since Last June  John C. Chien  Main CFD Forum  3  July 12, 1999 09:38 
Which is better to develop inhouse CFD code or to buy a available CFD package.  Tareq Alshaalan  Main CFD Forum  10  June 12, 1999 23:27 