CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Myong Kasagi Low Reynolds k-epsilon model coding

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 3, 2012, 15:28
Default Myong Kasagi Low Reynolds k-epsilon model coding
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 8
RSilva is on a distinguished road
Hi folks!

I am trying to change a High Re k-ep model from a software that I have into a Low Re k-ep model, particularly the Kasagi model.

So far so good, except I have a couple of doubts that I'm kind of stuck...

1) The software does not let me per se to impose a "no-slip" condition at the walls, so I though of working around it by using a "Slip" condition plus zero velocity at the walls and last imposing a friction velocity at the same walls. Is this coherent?

2) Since it is a Low Reynolds closure model I have a value that I need to impose for epsilon at the walls and the adjacent cells. This is the big issue, since I keep getting an error for this part as I try to solve the simulation.

I define y+ as show here in the wiki , being a function of the friction velocity.

The equations for this model are in the following link:

I keep getting an error stating that the "epsilon" variable is not define in certain points. Am I coding the model incorrectly?

How do I combine the boundary conditions near the wall for epsilon and the rest of the domain?

Hope someone can help!


Rui Silva
RSilva is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2012, 08:06
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 8
RSilva is on a distinguished road
RSilva is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2012, 18:39
Senior Member
Julien de Charentenay
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 230
Rep Power: 11
julien.decharentenay is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to julien.decharentenay
Hi Rui,

I am no expert in turbulence modelling.

1) Slip condition: if the wall are slip wall, the wall velocity should have no impact on the flow. I believe that the friction velocity should get to the right behavior. It should be easy to validate on a boundary layer profile;

2) You have to apply a boundary condition for epsilon - probably as per the paper you listed. It looks like your code has an error, but it is impossible to say with the limited information.

There is one more aspect that you have not mentioned: damping functions (usually based on wall distance). I am assuming that you are able to take these into account.

Hope this help. Julien
Julien de Charentenay
julien.decharentenay is offline   Reply With Quote


coding, k-epsilon turbulence, low reynolds, myong-kasagi

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
low reynolds number K-epsilon model amar FLUENT 25 October 7, 2015 14:07
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
low Reynolds Model for pipe flow RugbyGandalf OpenFOAM 9 July 4, 2011 11:28
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 25, 2008 21:21
a low Re number model for impinging jets mahesh prakash Main CFD Forum 14 September 3, 1999 16:40

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58.