CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

A mesh problem of Speaker

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 4, 2012, 08:57
Angry A mesh problem of Speaker
  #1
New Member
 
Gao
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 13
gaozhengyu is on a distinguished road
I am doing a 2-D mesh of a speaker which have a diameter of 6.5 inch ,and the minimum mesh size is 0.0125 mm, I split the speaker into many parts in order to do the mesh easily but the smallest part cost me 1 hours and the biggest part can cost almost 4 days. Does it regular? It's just 2-D model. Or I did something wrong.

anyone can help me thx !
gaozhengyu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2012, 09:00
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Gao
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 13
gaozhengyu is on a distinguished road
the mesh what I use is hex
gaozhengyu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2012, 12:12
Thumbs up
  #3
New Member
 
RZA
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 13
Engr.RZA is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaozhengyu View Post
I am doing a 2-D mesh of a speaker which have a diameter of 6.5 inch ,and the minimum mesh size is 0.0125 mm, I split the speaker into many parts in order to do the mesh easily but the smallest part cost me 1 hours and the biggest part can cost almost 4 days. Does it regular? It's just 2-D model. Or I did something wrong.

anyone can help me thx !

What you are trying to do?

Either LES or URANS? If yes then what is time step and total mesh size.

What are the machine specs on which u r running the simulation?

I think 2D problem should not take more then a day for quad core processors with reasonable RAM.
Engr.RZA is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2012, 00:08
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Gao
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 13
gaozhengyu is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engr.RZA View Post
What you are trying to do?

Either LES or URANS? If yes then what is time step and total mesh size.

What are the machine specs on which u r running the simulation?

I think 2D problem should not take more then a day for quad core processors with reasonable RAM.
I am going to compare the result of the simulation by three cases, the mesh size of these three cases are 0.025mm, 0.0125mm, 0.00625mm. But I failed to do the mesh of case 3 because the mesh cost so much time.
this picture I have uploaded is the model .
I use the computer in my lab and its good, so we don't need to consider about the machine.
The elements of the mesh in case 2 is 1139244 .

thank you for your reply
gaozhengyu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2012, 02:42
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Gao
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 13
gaozhengyu is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by soti222 View Post
Trying to Perforate a speaker mesh capable with power detailer. No fortune on several perfs. Simply speaking Imported range from Autocad for the gaps,Speaker board is radiused..ie: 1/4 of a cyndrical tube placed horizontally...any ideas??

Thank you for your reply. I have solved this problem by Gambit.
gaozhengyu is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dynamic Mesh Problem. Tom Clark FLUENT 10 June 21, 2021 04:27
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 22 January 4, 2017 03:19
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 March 27, 2011 21:11
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10
Convergence problem when ustructured mesh is used. SangJin Ryu Siemens 3 October 5, 2000 20:26


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19.