
[Sponsors] 
How to stabilize an advection dominated finite volume scheme? WITH VIDEO! 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
January 9, 2013, 12:44 
How to stabilize an advection dominated finite volume scheme? WITH VIDEO!

#1 
New Member
Max
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 
Sponsored Links
I'm currently implementing a reactionadvectiondiffusion system on a closed 2Dsurface (surface of a sphere) using C. First I started using finite elements which works just fine for the diffusion, however I could not get the advection to work. After doing some research on the internet I've came to the conclusion that it's better to use finite volume for the advection part instead. So I've now implemented a vertexcentered finite volume routine with upwind scheme for the advection. However it's still unstable! My test is a single Gaussian pulse which is supposed to be advected around the sphere. Here's a typical plot I get: which is a cut at theta = pi/2. phi goes from 0 to 2*pi. The red curve is the initial condition and you can clearly see that this is unstable even though diffusion is still pretty strong. I would like to have a code, where the pulse gets advected by (e.g.) one rotation and has still the same shape. There's also a video: http://www.xammm.com/surf.mpeg I'm using a CrankNickolson/Cholesky decomposition scheme. Is there an easy way to stabilize this? Last edited by xammm; January 9, 2013 at 12:56. Reason: added "with video" in title 

Sponsored Links 
January 9, 2013, 13:23 

#2 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,415
Rep Power: 39 
what about the cfl number at which your code was tested?


January 9, 2013, 17:20 

#3 
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 13 
The mesh you are using looks indeed fine enough to rule out major dispersion and dissipation from the spatial scheme.... I assume it is a first order approximation (constants in cells?) .
As Filippo pointed out, the temporal scheme could be the issue. Whatever your CFL number, reduce it by a factor of 10, rerun the simulation and check the results. Just out of interest: What flux function are you using? 

January 9, 2013, 17:26 

#4  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,415
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:


January 10, 2013, 04:55 

#5 
Senior Member
Rami BenZvi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 10 
Hi xammm,
Best luck,
Rami 

January 10, 2013, 05:04 

#6  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,415
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
What do you mean? Perhaps, owing to the second order time integration, is not strange that the solution shows over/underestimation even with firstorder upwind .. 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
The aspect ratio of the volume elements in Finite Volume Method  CharlieTan84  Main CFD Forum  3  August 28, 2012 02:34 
Finite Volume Method  cfd seeker  Main CFD Forum  3  September 8, 2011 04:36 
Control Volume Finite Element Method  gerardosrez  Main CFD Forum  0  March 16, 2011 15:49 
About finite volume methods for NS  Lionel BRS  Main CFD Forum  6  July 16, 2006 03:15 
Finite Volume Example  Matt Kellerman  Main CFD Forum  1  April 10, 2002 11:42 
Sponsored Links 