|
[Sponsors] |
March 6, 2013, 05:01 |
energy eqn + constant fluid properties
|
#1 |
New Member
Bob
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello to all,
I'm bit confused about the impact of energy equation on the obtained results, namely: I have launched 2 analyses, one with total energy equation and second one without energy equation. In both cases I'm simulating the flow of incompressible fluid (water) with constant fluid properties (viscosity/conductivity, density). Finally i'm obtaining two different pressure drops. My question is why? Since the fluid properties in both cases are the same (are not temperature depended) I would expect the same results... Or it does impact on the turbulence ? Thanks in advance for your suggestions. Cheers, bob |
|
March 6, 2013, 07:13 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
andy
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
If the code lets you hold the density constant then the "thermodynamic pressure" would have to change but I am not sure the physical meaning would be sensible. An incompressible flow usually has a constant "thermodynamic pressure" throughout the solution region and then the "pressure" variations simply follow the mechanical acceleration/deceleration of the fluid. This knocks out sound waves which is usually the main objective. The constant background thermodynamic pressure may change through time (e.g. a piston chamber) but remains constant in space. Varying this background thermodynamic component while hold density constant seems odd but there may be some physical cases where the assumption is reasonable. Anyone? |
||
Tags |
constant fluid properties, energy equation |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chemical properties that are used in Fluent | kimej | FLUENT | 4 | August 19, 2011 11:29 |
Constant flow rate through a small area inside the fluid domain. | robingilbert | OpenFOAM | 7 | October 4, 2010 16:19 |
My Revised "Time Vs Energy" Article For Review | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 9, 2002 09:08 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 09:11 |
Why FVM for high-Re flows? | Zhong Lei | Main CFD Forum | 23 | May 14, 1999 13:22 |