# Time step for implicit solver

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 March 24, 2013, 10:27 Time step for implicit solver #1 Super Moderator   Sijal Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Islamabad Posts: 4,352 Blog Entries: 6 Rep Power: 45 I am simulating low pressure turbine unsteady flow and I have couple of questions: 1. How to decide time step for the implicit solver? 2. Do we need to satisfy CFL < 1 for implicit solver? 3. Why implicit solver is preferred in commercial codes and as I understand for unsteady flows explicit solver would be better option. 4. Or explicit solver is only efficient in LES where turbulent scales to be resolved are the same order as the time step dictated by CFL < 0.2 condition? 5. For the same geometry and flow, time step is inversely proportional to Reynolds number?

 March 24, 2013, 11:10 #2 Senior Member     Alex Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Germany Posts: 1,534 Rep Power: 25 A CFL number smaller than 1 is a stability constraint for some explicit solvers which does not apply to the implicit ones. This partly answers question 3, because with the implicit solvers, the timestep size can be chosen according to the flow considered and does not have to fulfill a CFL criterium. Since a CFL number below 1 is a good guess for the timestep in LES, the advantage of implicit solvers allowing for larger timesteps becomes irrelevant, since the timestep has to be small anyway. According to Kolmogorovs turbulence theory, the timescale of the smallest eddies is proportional to . Yet this is only relevant for DNS. In a LES, there are different approaches to estimate an appropriate time step size, like CFL<1 for example.

 March 24, 2013, 16:53 #3 Senior Member   Filippo Maria Denaro Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 3,503 Rep Power: 40 the choice is driven by the numerical stability as well as accuracy requirements.... often, implicit scheme are not "pure", in the sense they are mixed in an implicit and an explicit part. For example, a classical integration used in DNS/LES is the Crank-Nicolson for the diffusion and the Adams-Basforth for the convection. This result in a conditionally stable scheme that is not stable only under the satisfation of the cfl<1 condition. It exists a stability region in the cfl-Reh plane.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post pUl| FLUENT 31 August 21, 2015 04:46 karasa03 OpenFOAM 7 December 12, 2013 04:41 bookie56 OpenFOAM Installation 8 August 13, 2011 04:03 barath.ezhilan OpenFOAM 13 July 16, 2009 05:55 skabilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 September 17, 2007 17:48

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:36.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top