
[Sponsors] 
3D axisymmetric flow in cylindrical coordinate = 2D cartesian flow? 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
May 1, 2013, 11:33 
3D axisymmetric flow in cylindrical coordinate = 2D cartesian flow?

#1 
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6 
Sponsored Links
I'm simulating a axisymmetric flow in 3D cylindrical coordinate. Since it's axisymmetric, I'm thinking if I can rewrite the code in 2D cartesian, just by looking at one plane with constant azimuthal angle. The governing equations in 3D cylindrical coordinate has additionally terms like , f being either velocity or pressure. If I want to write the code in 2D, then terms like these should be discarded (because now it's cartesian). My question is, now it seems to me that the governing equations are different for this same problem. I know this may sound absurd, could any one explain it? Thanks. Shu 

Sponsored Links 
May 1, 2013, 15:00 

#3 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,415
Rep Power: 39 
but the axisymmetric geometry does not imply the same simmetry in the flow... that is realized for laminar steady flows as well as for statistically averaged turbulent flows but, in general, the flow can be fully threedimensional also for symmetric geometries ...


May 1, 2013, 16:10 

#4  
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
Could you be more specific? What will you deal with those f/r terms? In 3D cylindrical coordinate, they are singularities, while in 2D, no such problem. Thanks. Shu 

May 1, 2013, 16:12 

#5  
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
I have some problem following what you said... Do you think I can do 2D cartesian for 3D axisymmetric flow? What physics will I lost when I do this? Thanks, Shu 

May 1, 2013, 16:15 

#6  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,415
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
The flow solution in DNS/LES/URANS can not be modelled correctly by simmetry conditions 

May 2, 2013, 04:13 

#7 
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 20 
If you have 3d axissymmetry it means that you have a rotational body and also the flow is rotationally symmetrical. You can not model this by 2d cartesian coordinats, because this a complete different symmetry. If you use 2d axisymmetric then you will indeed get exactly the same result.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. 

May 2, 2013, 04:39 

#8  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,415
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
onset of instability can destroy the rotational flow symmetry even for a geometrical symmetry (just think of a flow around a cylinder at Re>40  50)...this happens, for example, in round jets, in pipes, etc. In turbulent statistically steady flows, you can use RANS formulations and recover the symmetry but you solve for a statistical field. 

May 2, 2013, 12:43 

#9 
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 8 
He isn't asking about whether or not have can assume axisymmetric flow, he is asking how to write down the equations. If the flow is axisymmetric you can indeed reduce the problem to two dimension, however you are not reducing it to Cartesian coordinates. You will still have the 1/r terms in the equations to deal with. Basically take the full 3d cylindrical equations and set all of the terms with either a theta velocity or a theta derivative to zero and you will get you new set of equations. The 1/r terms don't cause singularities if your boundary conditions are correct.


May 2, 2013, 13:36 

#10 
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 20 
Alright, now it makes sense. Shubiaohewan, all the terms f/r are terms, where f is the derivative of something. Now, for r>0, also f>0 (due to the symmetry). If you rummage in your memmory and use de L'Hospitals rule, you will see, that the (dy/dr)/r for r>0 actually is the second derivative, dy^2/dr^2, in axisymmetric cases. So for the inner points, where r=0, you have a different set of equations, because you need to discretize second instead of first derivatives. All fluxes are zero there.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. 

May 2, 2013, 14:08 

#11  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,415
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
I agree but I would remark that using symmetric conditions requires some knowledge about the type of flow to solve for. Depending on the physics, you can realize a simulation both in the (r,z) and (r,theta) planes. Or you need to solve the 3D flows ... 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Two phase flow in cylindrical coordinate  hilllike  Main CFD Forum  10  September 1, 2013 21:32 
About Some Concepts:Laminar flow, turbulent flow, steady flow and timedependent flow  Jing  Main CFD Forum  5  March 2, 2013 15:02 
Review: Reversed flow  CRT  FLUENT  0  July 20, 2012 13:03 
cylindrical coordinate Gambit  noussa  ANSYS Meshing & Geometry  2  June 12, 2010 09:07 
StarCD Cylindrical coordinate  hamoudi  STARCD  4  April 29, 2009 11:11 
Sponsored Links 