CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   Question about turbulence intensity (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/120496-question-about-turbulence-intensity.html)

Anna Tian July 8, 2013 11:22

Question about turbulence intensity
 
Hi

Here is my approach to detect the flow regime for flow in complex geometry:

1) Run the simulation by SST model (or other turbulence model)

2) Look at the turbulence intensity value to know the flow regime


Question:

1) Does this approach make sense?

2) What is the range of the turbulence intensity value corresponding to laminar flow? And transitional flow?

MachZero July 8, 2013 23:32

Anna, what is your application? What kind of model is this. Internal flow or external? There is no strict guideline for laminar vs turbulent, it is model dependent. Tell more about the model and what you are trying to get out of it

Anna Tian July 9, 2013 04:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by MachZero (Post 438569)
Anna, what is your application? What kind of model is this. Internal flow or external? There is no strict guideline for laminar vs turbulent, it is model dependent. Tell more about the model and what you are trying to get out of it

This is for internal flow in heat exchanger for electronics cooling. I need to find out the flow is laminar or turbulent. Then I can choose an appropriate model (If it's detected to be laminar, then laminar model. If's it's detected to be turbulent, then SST model.) to resolve the overall pressure drop.

FMDenaro July 9, 2013 07:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anna Tian (Post 438609)
This is for internal flow in heat exchanger for electronics cooling. I need to find out the flow is laminar or turbulent. Then I can choose an appropriate model (If it's detected to be laminar, then laminar model. If's it's detected to be turbulent, then SST model.) to resolve the overall pressure drop.


make an estimation of your main non-dimensional parameters (Re, Pr, Ra), laminar conditions are very rare in practical applications, the reality is that laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regions often cohexist.

Anna Tian July 9, 2013 08:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by FMDenaro (Post 438642)
make an estimation of your main non-dimensional parameters (Re, Pr, Ra), laminar conditions are very rare in practical applications, the reality is that laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regions often cohexist.

For complex geometry, Re always doesn't make a lot of sense. I have Re = 100 with very good grids quality but the simulation doesn't converge any more with laminar model. How to use Pr and Ra to tell the flow regime?

Could turbulence intensity value also give a hint?

Anna Tian July 10, 2013 12:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by FMDenaro (Post 438642)
make an estimation of your main non-dimensional parameters (Re, Pr, Ra), laminar conditions are very rare in practical applications, the reality is that laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regions often cohexist.

Could anyone get a hint about the flow regime from the turbulence intensity value?

MachZero July 11, 2013 08:13

I don't work with electronics much so my opinion definitely doesn't count as fact here. Are you calculating re based on channel height or the height of an object that air is moving around? 100 is low enough that I would use a laminar model personally but would make sure my boundary layers are well resolved. Just my two cents

Anna Tian July 15, 2013 11:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anna Tian (Post 438656)
For complex geometry, Re always doesn't make a lot of sense. I have Re = 100 with very good grids quality but the simulation doesn't converge any more with laminar model. How to use Pr and Ra to tell the flow regime?

Could turbulence intensity value also give a hint?

Could anyone get a hint about the flow regime from the turbulence intensity value?

triple_r July 15, 2013 19:19

As someone mentioned in previous answers turbulence intensity that you get from simulation is model dependent. In my experience SST was good for internal flows in shutting itself off when flow was laminar, giving very low turbulence viscosity ratios (I ran a case with laminar and SST model, for low enough Reynolds numbers, SST results were close enough to the laminar solution).

However, my suggestion would be to try a transitional model. SST has such an extension (look for Menter's paper on a transitional model for CFD applications). There are also other transitional models and similar to turbulence modeling you might want to try a few and pick the best for your application. These models are going to add a few extra equations to your simulation, so they will be slightly slower than a pure turbulence model.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50.