CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Isotropic EV

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 22, 2013, 12:59
Default Isotropic EV
New Member
Darryl McClure
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
mcclud is on a distinguished road
I am studying Prandtl's secondary flow of the second kind and have stumbled upon something that I can't make sense of.

Many authors state that the normal Re stresses are all equal to \frac{2}{3}k with turbulence models relying on the Boussinesq approximation for closure. But when I finally looked at the approximation myself (incompressible):
\overline{u_i u_j} = \frac{2}{3}k \delta_{ij} - \nu_t(\frac{\partial U_i}{\partial x_j} +\frac{\partial U_j}{\partial x_i})
It gives
\overline{u^{2}} = \frac{2}{3}k - 2\nu_t\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}
\overline{v^{2}} = \frac{2}{3}k  - 2\nu_t\frac{\partial V}{\partial y}
\overline{w^{2}} = \frac{2}{3}k  - 2\nu_t\frac{\partial W}{\partial z}

What assumption or piece of logic allows each of the normal Re stresses to equal \frac{2}{3}k?

I have also seen a statement in a thread that the shear Re stresses are all zero when using Boussinesq for closure. Any explanation on this point as well? Because the Boussinesq approximation equation seems to refute both of these claims.

Any corrections or comments on my understanding are welcome.

mcclud is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 22, 2013, 13:49
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,752
Rep Power: 41
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
I am not sure to have fully understood your question ...Are you considering U as Reynolds averaged? Then

(uu)bar= UU + (u'u')bar

you will model (u'u')bar as supplementary eddy viscosity tensor Td but it must be zero traced. Therefore, you decompose in isotropic and deviatoric tensors

Td=(1/3)I *Trace(Td) + Td0

For incompressible flows, the isotropic part is simply summed to the pressure and you solve for a global scalar field whose gradients ensure the divergence-free velocity.

Sorry if I did not get the right meaning of your question ...
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
difference between isotropic and homogeneous in turbulence dut_thinker Main CFD Forum 7 November 8, 2015 00:44
help on isotropic turbulence initial condition Hall Main CFD Forum 8 April 28, 2011 16:55
Help needed on homogeneous isotropic turbulence an Guoping Xia Main CFD Forum 0 March 12, 2006 22:54
Isotropic Turbulence gorka Main CFD Forum 2 June 30, 2003 15:41
isotropic homogeneous turbulence tingguang Main CFD Forum 0 August 1, 2002 17:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:03.