CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum


Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 10, 2006, 03:52
Default piso
Posts: n/a
I read sometimes here in the forum, that to choose courant number around 0.5-1.0 for the time step size in PISO is a good choice... but in this case I could also you an explicit time discretization, what is the advantage from piso against an explixit algorithm?!?!
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2006, 09:01
Default Re: piso
Iain Barton
Posts: n/a
Good question.

By explicit algorihm, most people would presume that you mean something like a Jameson sheme. In which case the CFL number has the speed of sound in it, so you cannot make a direct comparison.

CFL(incompressible) = delta_t * vel / Length_scale CFL(compressible) = delta_t * (vel + c) / Length_scale

But let's assume, we are going to make an incompressible code explicit... I believe most of the commercial codes will let you switch on an explicit solver, (I have been told FLUENT can). The closest research code that I have seen is KIVA which can do explicit/implicit splitting of the convection and diffusion terms. (There is a logic here your diffusion shouldn't affect pressure waves).

The problem writing an explicit incompressible flow solver is that it ruins your PISO/SIMPLE/SIMPLEC/etc. derivation, full-stop. What you will achieve is a kind-of pseudo-compressibility solver (i.e. FIDAP-type solver), the coefficients in your pressure correction equation will only depend on temporal terms, since no one uses this approach it must be inferior.


ps for steady-state problems you should be able to push PISO/SIMPLE to 3.0 or so quite happily.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Development of a Low mach PISO solver nishant_hull OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 August 25, 2009 12:48
PISO 50 with discarge coeff down??? Andrea Siemens 1 February 1, 2008 14:33
SIMPLE and PISO Aditya Main CFD Forum 5 April 1, 2006 18:52
Please Answer (PISO) benedikt flurl Main CFD Forum 2 May 14, 2005 03:12
PISO vs. SIMPLE benedikt flurl Main CFD Forum 2 April 14, 2005 06:54

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25.