CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

PDF for tubulence-combustion

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 31, 1999, 11:45
Default PDF for tubulence-combustion
Sun Wen
Posts: n/a
Dear All,

How can I couple the turbulence-combustion in the modeling of turbulent diffusion flames if the k-epsilon model is used for the turbulence field and detailed chemistry used for the combustion with multi-compoment species?

How to use the presumed PDF with only one scalar such as mixture fraction and its variance to get the mean multi-species concentrations and temperature?

Best regards,

Sun Wen

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 2, 1999, 07:29
Default Re: PDF for tubulence-combustion
Roland Bender
Posts: n/a
For detailed chemistry you need much more than the mixture fraction. Depending on the fuel you need to calculate the balance equations for great number of species (15-30).

If you use the Eddy-Break-Up model or the assumption 'mixed equal burned' it is possible to use mixture fraction only.

Your question is very unspecific. If you write more about the case you want to calculate, i can perhabs give you a better answer.

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 2, 1999, 13:19
Default Re: PDF for tubulence-combustion
Sun Wen
Posts: n/a

Sorry to write an unspesific quenstion.

I don't want to use the "simple" model such as EBU or fast chemistry assumption. The detailed chemistry is my concern for the combustion model. e.g. for H2/Air turbulent diffusion flames, I can solve 8 species with 40 chemical reactions to deal with the quenching phenomena. The k-epsilon model is used for the turbulence.

But my question is how to couple the combustion-turbulence in a simplest way. I can get the mixture fraction from the element such as H, O etc. Is it possible not to use the joint PDF to calculate the mean chemical reaction rate? Some people use the mixture fraction and the progress rate for the two-scalar PDF and use equilibrium assumption to obtain each species. And I also don't want to use 'flamelet' model, because I am not familiar with it.

Many thanks for your more advices.

Sun Wen
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 1999, 08:29
Default Re: PDF for tubulence-combustion
Roland Bender
Posts: n/a
In general it is impossible to calculate the chemical source with the mean composition!

If you want to use detailed chemistry, you have use a joint pdf. You can solve the pdf transport equation either with a presumed pdf or with a monte carlo approach.

I don't know if somebody has combined presumed-pdf with detailed chemistry so far. The monte carlo approach was combined with detailed chemistry or reduced ILDM-chemistry in some papers.

The alternative is DNS.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
transported PDF for combustion (total energy PDF) mathieu ourliac Main CFD Forum 0 April 10, 2008 05:38
Reducing residuals with PDF combustion model Don FLUENT 0 January 7, 2008 10:06
EDC, PDF transport and turbulent combustion HP FLUENT 6 March 30, 2005 03:00
Presumed PDF for methane combustion Andreas Siemens 0 May 21, 2003 09:07
PDF combustion model to simulate reaction of gas i Mark FLUENT 0 August 4, 2001 11:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:25.