
[Sponsors] 
August 28, 2013, 02:12 
Inviscid Turbulent flow

#1 
Senior Member
Vino
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 6 
Sponsored Links


Sponsored Links 
August 28, 2013, 03:15 
Inviscid Turbulent flow

#2 
New Member
rizzu
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6 
Yes, If the fluid has no viscosity, the viscous force will be small compared to inertial force. So the value of the Reynold’s number will be high. So we will have turbulent flow. But one thing practically, there is no invisid fluid, as every fluid has some viscosity. But for our calculation purpose if the fluid has low viscosity, we assume the viscosity is zero.


August 28, 2013, 03:51 

#3 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
inviscid turbulence is a theoretical situation: for zero viscosity (infinite Reynolds number) the turbulence features an energy cascade extending up to an infinite wavenumbers since the Kolomogorov scale is zero. No dissipative part of the energy spectrum exists.
In such case, no DNS is realizable and LES can be performed with some care. See this LES: http://wwwpersonal.engin.umd.umich....nn_Dhanak2.pdf 

August 28, 2013, 11:19 

#4  
Senior Member
duri
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 9 
Quote:
There is no such inviscid tubulent model, what ever dissipation a cfd solver gives is purely numerical. Since high reynolds number flow can be approximated to inviscid flow except near boundary layer, it cannot be used for many cases except were viscous effects dominates. 

August 28, 2013, 11:54 

#5  
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 13 
Quote:
Turbulence is generated through a vortex stretching mechanism, which only required threedimensionality. Viscosity is NOT needed to produce a scale cascade, only to limit the cascade to a finite bandwidth. 

August 28, 2013, 11:58 

#6  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
Vorticity equation exists too for inviscid flows and stretching term does not vanish for Euler equation. The contribution of the viscosity is in the appearance of the end of the inertiale energy cascade due to the dissipation. 

August 28, 2013, 12:44 

#7 
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 12 
While it is true that turbulence is generated by vortex stretching, which is present even in inviscid flows, the question still presents itself: where does the vorticity arise. Since the original poster stated that his interest is in practical applications, this question is not a trivial one. In any application with solid walls, the absence of viscosity not only eliminates a source of vorticity production, but also removes a strong local damping function of turbulence. Substituting numerical dissipation for physical viscosity has always seemed a little off to me, and I'm still skeptical of results from such simulations. Of course, I had a colleague once who said that all turbulence models are just rough approximations, and maybe an inviscid approach is just a little rougher than most.


August 28, 2013, 12:57 

#8  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:


August 29, 2013, 08:14 

#9  
Senior Member
Vino
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
My doubt again is, as our friend said above, is there any possibility that an inviscid flow can generate turbulence? even when we stir inviscid flow with spoon for example, we can not generate vorticity, because of slip condition.( i agree that the situation is different for practical idealization which was my original question ) 

August 29, 2013, 08:48 

#10 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
Ok, let's stop for a moment thinking about vorticity.
Consider the 1D inviscid Burgers equation du/dt + d/dx (u^2/2) =0 This model produces what is called "Burgulence", see http://arxiv.org/pdf/nlin/0012033.pdf Now consider a very smooth initial condition, for example u(x,0) = u0*sin(x), you will simply see that the Fourier component exp(ikx) when inserted into the non linear term will produce exp(2ikx) and so on for time passing... This is the generation of a scale cascade adn is a model to understand the born of turbulence. The issue is that even a very smooth initial field can produce an infinite number of wavelenghts. Of course, if the initial is exactly zero you can not generate nothing but if you have some "small fluctuations" superimposed this generates a cascade. in 2 and 3D cases, the scenario is the same, the non linearity in the momentum equation generates the scale cascade that can be seen by the vorticity in the stretching action. Viscosity will only dissipate vortices at the Kolmogorov scale (well, the dissipation starts at the Taylor microscale and continues up to the Kolmogorov scale) In conclusion, any practical application in which velocity gradients are present and interact by means of the non linear convection, produce scale cascade despite of the absence of viscosity. 

August 29, 2013, 15:07 

#11 
Senior Member
Vino
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 6 
Thank you very much. Now i got some better clarity regarding this.


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
reversed flow at pressure inlet and turbulent viscosity is limited....  cfdiscool  FLUENT  10  June 10, 2015 06:15 
Turbulent Flow in Straight Square Duct  kep Validation  mcclud  STARCCM+  2  August 7, 2012 16:56 
Turbulent flow + VOF  CK  FLOW3D  3  January 13, 2009 08:30 
Natural convection  Inlet boundary condition  max91  CFX  1  July 29, 2008 20:28 
Inviscid flow solver  luca_g  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  0  December 21, 2006 13:55 
Sponsored Links 