
[Sponsors] 
September 25, 2013, 23:32 
Localized & nonlocalized quantity

#1 
Senior Member
Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 8 
Hi friends;
I read the book about turbulence in which it is mentioned that U (velocity) is a nonlocalized quantity, whereas vorticity is a localized quantity. Does anyone know that what localized quantity means? what characteristics it has? and also the differences between these two type quantities? thanks in advance.
__________________
Best Regards; Mehdi Email: mb.pejvak[at]Gmail[dot]com 

September 26, 2013, 23:19 

#2 
Senior Member
Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 8 
The concept in discussion is what is called a local or a nonlocal property of a field. That means that, if the property in discussion is local, its value can be defined in each point of a field and its value only depends on the values of other properties/variables in the point of study or observation. In other words, everything is locally determined by the values in each point.
A nonlocal property of a field is that where its value in each point in the field depends on the values of properties or variables all over the space where the field is defined. Due to the fact that for an incompressible fluid, the pressure field satisfies a Laplace equation with a source term (Poissons equation), it is possible to formally solve the pressure field as a function of the source term by means of the BiotSavart law (really it is a Green's function). The result is an integral over all the definition space of the pressure field and the value of the pressure at each point depends on values of other properties/variables all over this definition space. Therefore, pressure is a nonlocal variable and so is velocity since it depends on the gradient of pressure, the gradient of this volume integral over the definition space. The vorticity equation has not a direct dependence on pressure and, therefore, vorticity is a local variable.
__________________
Best Regards; Mehdi Email: mb.pejvak[at]Gmail[dot]com 

September 27, 2013, 03:46 

#3 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,003
Rep Power: 35 
I suppose that the mathematical classification of a PDE can also be considered... hyperbolic and parabolic equations have real characteristic curves and the properties depends only upon specific portion of the domaina. Elliptic equations, such as the pressure equation, have no real characteristic curves so that the dependence is upon the whole integration domain.


September 28, 2013, 03:27 

#4  
Senior Member
Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 8 
Quote:
thank you for your comment. I thought about your opinion, but I think it can not be governed for all equation. for example, vorticity equation (D omega/D t=(Omega.Grad) U+no (Laplacian Omega)) which is elliptic, but vorticity is local quantity. do you think so?
__________________
Best Regards; Mehdi Email: mb.pejvak[at]Gmail[dot]com 

September 28, 2013, 03:31 

#5  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,003
Rep Power: 35 
Quote:
Vorticity equation is not elliptic in the unsteady formulation 

September 28, 2013, 22:15 

#6 
Senior Member
Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 8 
thank you for the point. you are right, but how can explain U as a nonlocalized quantity based on its equation. NS can be parabolic and hyperbolic, but based on what I understand U is nonlocalized. is it only because of pressure gradient in NS equation?
__________________
Best Regards; Mehdi Email: mb.pejvak[at]Gmail[dot]com 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Solving a Laplace equation for a scalar quantity  ali hemmati  FLUENT  11  February 16, 2015 21:42 
Custom quantity  set Units panel  igorb  FLUENT  0  June 28, 2013 04:21 
Calculate a quantity based on another quantity solved by Openfoam.  hz283  OpenFOAM  10  December 27, 2012 02:47 
Quantity RADP(i) in KIVA 3V R2  Felix  Main CFD Forum  2  January 18, 2006 13:18 