# kinetic energy

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 15, 2006, 22:46 kinetic energy #1 jj Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Sir, how to find kinetic energy in the lid drivencavity problem. plz give me the formula..

 November 16, 2006, 01:56 Re: kinetic energy #2 amarnath Guest   Posts: n/a Hai! i think u want the KE of each fluid partical in the cavity. if it is the case, i think u have to use the general formula (0.5*rho*V^2), where V is the total velocity of each individual partical

 November 17, 2006, 00:21 Re: kinetic energy #3 jj Guest   Posts: n/a im using E(nxdelt)=SUM((u(i,j)^2+v(i,j)^2)^0.5) where n is the no. of time step. and delt is the relaxation time. im using steady state equation with pseduo transient. is this formula right

 November 17, 2006, 04:52 Re: kinetic energy #4 amarnath Guest   Posts: n/a but what is SUM indicates! are u trying to find out the average velocity of all the particles, the u have to use the rms value. that formula u can get from kinetic theory of gases. and i want to know exactly what u r doing!

 November 17, 2006, 08:31 Re: kinetic energy #5 Jonas Holdeman Guest   Posts: n/a Your formula is for the average velocity on a uniform mesh, or for the L2 norm of the velocity. KE is proportional to the velocity squared, so you need to remove the square root. For KE, you need to multiply by 1/2 and by the density if your equations are not scaled so that the density is 1. For a non-uniform mesh, you must multiply (or weight) the velocity squared at each node by a volume associated with the node. Some times mathematicians will refer to just the velocity squared as the kinetic energy, ignoring multiplicative constants, when establishing bounds on solutions.

 November 17, 2006, 09:31 Re: kinetic energy #6 M.Lipinski Guest   Posts: n/a Jonas, Why do you need to weight velocity with the volume? Taking half of the square of the magnitude of the velocity vector and multiplying it by the density gives you kinetic energy per unit volume so it does not need any scaling even if the mesh is non-uniform. regards M.Lipinski

 November 18, 2006, 08:10 Re: kinetic energy #7 Jonas Holdeman Guest   Posts: n/a Re: M. Lipinski -- "Taking half of the square of the magnitude of the velocity vector and multiplying it by the density gives you kinetic energy per unit volume" gives the KE at a point. jj is summing over the nodes of the mesh and hence calculating the total KE over the domain. By dimensional analysis, one must multiply (KE/vol) by a volume to get KE.

 November 18, 2006, 09:55 Re: kinetic energy #8 M.Lipinski Guest   Posts: n/a OK Jonas, I see your point. Though I think that the KE/Vol (KE per unit volume) is something that is more interesting than KE. E.g. it will give you a constant value, in regions where RHO and velocity are constant, independent of the element size. On the other side, KE involves mass that is clearly element size dependent. regards M.Lipinski

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post junker4236 Main CFD Forum 19 April 19, 2017 04:46 Craig FLUENT 3 September 8, 2012 11:34 alastormoody11 STAR-CCM+ 1 January 19, 2011 10:48 Jenny CFX 3 November 19, 2008 21:12 lcw FLUENT 1 June 13, 2006 03:08