|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Thermal boundary implication (constant heat flux) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
SAM
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hi Dears
I found this quota in a paper, why implementation of constant heat flux is difficult? "For the thermal boundary condition, the temperature distribution along the pipe wall was specified, based on the data. Although a constant heat flux was applied as the thermal boundary condition in the experiment, with the present DNS technique it is didifficult to treat a constant wall heat flux condition for spatially developing flow problems" Thanks for your time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,060
Rep Power: 75 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
From this statement is not clear .... as DNS is referred as, the number of grid point in the thermal BL have to be sufficient to impose a Neuman BC. |
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low Mixing time Problem | Mavier | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2013 01:00 |
| Heat Flux Profile at Fluid-Porous Interface | Hitch8 | CFX | 4 | December 15, 2012 10:57 |
| CFX doesn't continue calculation... | mactech001 | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2009 22:25 |
| Heat flux and k-e wall boundary conditions | Blob | CFX | 4 | June 8, 2009 06:10 |
| Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue | Miguel Baritto | CFX | 4 | August 31, 2006 13:02 |