mass loss in Level Set

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 8, 2007, 03:09 mass loss in Level Set #1 dusky.he Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links I used Level set to simulate an uprising bubble in liquid. But the bubble is getting smaller and smaller. Does anyone has this problem? I do not know the origin of the mass loss. It is from the Level set Eq. or from the accuracy of N-S Thanks a lot

 February 8, 2007, 05:53 Re: mass loss in Level Set #2 rt Guest   Posts: n/a This is well-known problem in LSM (due to numerical diffusion), (probably your literature review is very poor) thare are several treamtment as cure: 1. increase spatial resolution 2. increase accuracy of your JH solver (e.g. high order WENO + TVD RK) 3. Use Hybrid particle level set method for reducing diffusion (is really effective way) 4. Use spatially addaptive refinement near interface. 5. Use VOF instead of LSM !

 February 8, 2007, 07:01 Re: mass loss in Level Set #3 qunwuhe Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks for your suggestion Then it means it has no connection with NS solver I used WENO+RT for LS eq. but it does not improve I am thinking of using higher scheme for convective term in NS solver.

 February 8, 2007, 07:55 Re: mass loss in Level Set #4 khan Guest   Posts: n/a This happen because of the volume dissipation. an alternate method is Allen-cahn model with lagrange multiplier or use of chan-hilliard model to control the volume dissipation of the bubble.

 February 8, 2007, 08:32 Re: mass loss in Level Set #5 rt Guest   Posts: n/a >Then it means it has no connection with NS solver it is clear that we expect mass-inbalance in the same order as we solve NS, in clear word based on residual of continuty satisfaction, but LSM has usually severe mass lose, so sometimes bubble can be completely dissipated during advection. This is completely related to LSM not NS, e.g. if u switch from LSM to VOF u can preserve mass in accceptable manner (usually below 1% inbalance can be acheived). >I used WENO+RT for LS eq. but it does not improve I am not agree ! do you experience that with increase order of WENO mass loss is decreased, if no, certainly your imlementation is problematic because this fact is well-documented in literatures. >I am thinking of using higher scheme for convective term >in NS solver. Why? if your velosity field is divergence free (bleow prescribed treshold), NS solver is fine ! (from mass-inbalance view point) For simplicity u can forget NS and stick only to advection step, e.g. use rigid body advection test such as Zalesak's circle in the prescribed divergence-free velosity field, then study effect of high-order HJ solver and sitution of mass loss.

 February 8, 2007, 10:00 Re: mass loss in Level Set #6 qunwuhe Guest   Posts: n/a Actually, I am using Cahn-Hilliard equation. The mass loss is severe. I am trying to find the problem. I used steady flow field, there is no mass lost

 February 8, 2007, 12:09 Re: mass loss in Level Set #7 Renato. Guest   Posts: n/a Are you redistancing the level set after each time step? I'm asking it because there are some mass correction algorithms that can be used when redistancing/rebuilding the level sets -- I have some references talking about it... the problem is to find ;o) . Cheers Renato.

 February 9, 2007, 08:29 Re: mass loss in Level Set #8 qunwuhe Guest   Posts: n/a Mr. rt Thank you so much If possible, could you give me your mail address, I^d like to send you some results of my simulation. Thanks He

 February 9, 2007, 09:40 Re: mass loss in Level Set #9 rt Guest   Posts: n/a

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post arwang FLUENT 2 March 12, 2007 21:04 Renato. Main CFD Forum 7 February 7, 2006 07:46 ls newbie Main CFD Forum 0 March 17, 2004 15:17 Zi-Wei Chiou Main CFD Forum 6 September 19, 2001 09:37 Niklas Wikstrom Main CFD Forum 1 September 9, 1999 13:08