CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Turbulence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By flotus1
  • 1 Post By truffaldino
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 14, 2014, 02:44
Default Turbulence
  #1
New Member
 
Geth
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15
arungeth is on a distinguished road
Why free shear flows become turbulent at very low Re?..
arungeth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2014, 05:02
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,760
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by arungeth View Post
Why free shear flows become turbulent at very low Re?..

consider that the actual Re number is realated to the development of the flow, it increases along the streamwise as for a flow over a flat plate..
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2014, 05:29
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Geth
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15
arungeth is on a distinguished road
am asking..like a smoke from cigeratte is becomes turbulent at very low Re..but for flat plate it is very high...

Also, trans. Re is in the range of 10 power 5 for flat plate but in terms of 1000 for flow inside pipe..why?..can you give me clear description about these three things
arungeth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2014, 05:38
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,760
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by arungeth View Post
am asking..like a smoke from cigeratte is becomes turbulent at very low Re..but for flat plate it is very high...

Also, trans. Re is in the range of 10 power 5 for flat plate but in terms of 1000 for flow inside pipe..why?..can you give me clear description about these three things

But transition to turbulence is due to several factors...in pipe you have transition at Re = O(10^3), on an airfol at Re=O(10^5) you have still laminar flow. Turbulence can exists at low Re number, for example flow from a small orifice becomes rapidly turbulent.

Smoke from cigarette is just a visualization of turbulence already existing in air, is not the case of jet stream or mixing layer...
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2014, 08:12
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Geth
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15
arungeth is on a distinguished road
Ok..what is reason for these two above examples..as Re less for pipe and as same Re we get laminar in airfoil..
arungeth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2014, 09:04
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,396
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Reynolds numbers for different types of flows can not be compared like that.
If the Reynolds number for the flow over an airfoil is 10 times higher than the Reynolds number number for the flow in a pipe,
this does not imply that the airfoil flow has to be 10 times "more turbulent" than the pipe flow.
The Reynolds number can only be used to compare similar flows, like the flow through the same pipe at two different velocities.
The value of the critical Reynolds number at which a flow becomes turbulent is quite arbitrary and can not be compared to a different kind of flow.

As a last example, we could simply define a new Reynolds number for the flow in a circular pipe and say it is
Re_\text{new} = \frac{u \cdot r}{\nu}
where u is the average velocity, r is the pipe radius and nu is the kinematic viscosity.
Since our definition yields a Reynolds number lower by a factor of 2 compared to the usual definition of a Reynolds number for pipe flows,
its critical value is shifted to ~4600 although the flow is exactly the same.
The point is that the definition of the Reynolds number is to some extent arbitrary for each individual flow problem and is not an absolute measure for turbulence.
gfoam and AshwaniAssam like this.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2014, 09:23
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Geth
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15
arungeth is on a distinguished road
Thank you..
arungeth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2014, 15:06
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 15
Aeronautics El. K. is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by flotus1 View Post
The value of the critical Reynolds number at which a flow becomes turbulent is quite arbitrary
I agree with everything else you said but I don't sure about this one. You can estimate the critical Reynolds number using the Orr-Sommerfeld equation to constract the stability curves.
__________________
Lefteris

Aeronautics El. K. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2014, 15:50
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
lore
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 460
Rep Power: 18
lovecraft22 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to lovecraft22
It is actually the Reynolds experiment you are talking about. At some distance from a cigarette the Reynolds number (based on the distance from the cigarette, indeed) equals the critical value and the flow becomes turbulent.
lovecraft22 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2014, 21:19
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 15
Aeronautics El. K. is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by arungeth View Post
Ok..what is reason for these two above examples..as Re less for pipe and as same Re we get laminar in airfoil..
First of all, pipe flow and flow over an aerofoil are different types of flow and you can't really compare them. For example a Reynolds number Re=10000 may be very high for a pipe flow but it's very low for an aerofoil.

Factors that affect transition to turbulence are:
a. freestream pressure gradient
b. freestream turbulence
c. surface roughness
d. surface curvature
e. surface temperature
f. compressibility
__________________
Lefteris

Aeronautics El. K. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2014, 11:12
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 249
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 17
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by arungeth View Post
Also, trans. Re is in the range of 10 power 5 for flat plate but in terms of 1000 for flow inside pipe..why?..can you give me clear description about these three things

If you look to these two problems more carefully, you will see that transition reynolds number are actually of the same order for both.... Only for the flat plate flow one should consider reynolds number based on the boundary layer thikness.
mb.pejvak likes this.
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2014, 02:40
Default
  #12
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,553
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeronautics El. K. View Post
I agree with everything else you said but I don't sure about this one. You can estimate the critical Reynolds number using the Orr-Sommerfeld equation to construct the stability curves.
Critical reynolds number depends on many factors such as turbulence intensity, roughness etc. so it is random number and its value may deviate by order of magnitude.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2014, 15:50
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 15
Aeronautics El. K. is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeronautics El. K. View Post
...
Factors that affect transition to turbulence are:
a. freestream pressure gradient
b. freestream turbulence
c. surface roughness
d. surface curvature
e. surface temperature
f. compressibility
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far View Post
Critical reynolds number depends on many factors such as turbulence intensity, roughness etc. so it is random number and its value may deviate by order of magnitude.
I know what affects transition
I just don't really understand the word "random" since there are tools (equations) for predicting the critical Reynolds number.
__________________
Lefteris

Aeronautics El. K. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2014, 16:00
Default
  #14
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,760
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
I think that the initial question was different... free shear turbulent flows at low Re number.

It is a classical example to think about a flow going through a grid and developing a homogeneous isotropi turbulence at some distance. That turbulence exists also at very small Re_lambda (Taylor microscale).
Aeronautics El. K. likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2014, 16:56
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 18
Hamidzoka is on a distinguished road
Dear All;
Let me come back to the first question:
"Why free shear flows become turbulent at very low Re?.."
I try to give a response by explaining two flow cases:

First, consider the flow near a solid wall. there is always a shear stress at near wall region that eventually induces turbulence to the flow. but the wall itself is rigid. so it can not excite the flow in wall normal direction. Therefore the wall impact is limited to the so called shear stress and normal components of Reynolds stress tensor diminish at near wall regions.

Second, consider that the instead of wall there is another fluid zone. what happens then? a shear stress develops at the fluid-fluid interface. since the interface is not rigid, so it can be easily deformed by the so called shear stress and as a result some fluid particles in macroscopic scales can go through the fluid-fluid interface and then come back to their zones again. this instability will be soon intensified to form a vortex flow between the fluid zones. therefore this intense mixing can induce the turbulence at vicinity of the interface very quick. note that unlike the first case there is no wall to damp normal components of Reynolds stress tensor and thus turbulence is freely developed at even low Re numbers.

Regards
Hamidzoka is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulence postprocessing Mohsin FLUENT 2 October 3, 2016 15:18
Turbulence length scale and integral length scale rizhang CFX 2 April 22, 2016 08:22
Question on Turbulence Intensity Eric FLUENT 1 March 7, 2012 05:30
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 10:52
Code release: Flow Transition and Turbulence Chaoqun Liu Main CFD Forum 0 September 26, 2008 18:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:05.