# Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 17, 1999, 03:34 Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent #1 Christian Tollschein Guest   Posts: n/a I tried to create an unstructured grid for a komplex geometry, which consisted of elements ranging from 0.1 mm to 20 meters. TGrid was not able to create the volume mesh in the area, where the small elements were located. Does anybody know how to solve this problem? Secondly, this geometry was like a conveyer belt pulled through an acid bath and the simulation should show how the acid moves with the belt because of frictional forces. How can this moving wall problem be solved with Fluent? Thanks a lot. Christian Tollschein

 September 17, 1999, 04:49 Re: Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent #2 Joern Beilke Guest   Posts: n/a For the first part: If you want a tet mesh then switch to ICEM Tetra which works much better.

 September 17, 1999, 06:45 Re: Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent #3 Jonas Larsson Guest   Posts: n/a If the moving wall is flat and moves at a constant velocity parallell to the wall you can just specify this when you set up your wall boundary condition in Fluent. About the TGrid problem. TGrid can surely generate grids with varying cell size. Generating tets only is usually no problem. Growing prisms can be a bit tricky. Often it takes some trial-and-error and you have to adjust the surface meshes slightly a few times before it works.

 September 17, 1999, 06:50 Re: Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent #4 Jonas Larsson Guest   Posts: n/a This is a very interesting statement. Could you perhaps elaborate a bit on when ICEM Tetra works better, which problems you had in TGrid that Tetra solved etc. I'm sure that many people would be interested in this. I have only experience from TGrid and, sure there are problems, but generally I've found it to be a reasonably stable and robust volume mesh-generator.

 September 17, 1999, 08:43 Re: Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent #5 Joern Beilke Guest   Posts: n/a There is no need to create a surface mesh in ICEM Tetra. This might save you a lot time. You just say how big the biggets cell should be and how small the smallest cell should be and also how fast the transistion between small and big is wanted. These options can be specified either global or region wise. Thats nearly all you have to do. After this the mesh can be smoothed an the prism layers will be included. Complex meshes can be created in less than 1 hour after cleaning the cad surface. Just ask ICEM for a trial license.

 September 17, 1999, 10:11 Re: Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent #6 Jonas Larsson Guest   Posts: n/a Sounds nice. How well does it handle IGES files with bad precision and no solids (only surfaces)? Is it stable? Is the prism-generation working better than it does in TGrid?

 September 17, 1999, 10:12 Re: Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent #7 Jin Wook LEE Guest   Posts: n/a Fluent has the cability to model very thin wall, in the computational domain, which can be treated as zero thickness. You don't need to create volume for the very thin wall. Instead, treat it zero thickness wall. I have had several experiences which is very similar to your problem, but for stationary walls. I guess the concept of thin wall in Fluent might work for the moving wall. Ask support group of Fluent company whether 'the concept of thin wall in Fluent' can be applied for moving wall or not'. If they say 'YES', I think it is just for your case and it can save your effort and computational time very much. Sincerely, Jinwook

 September 17, 1999, 12:18 Re: Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent #8 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). I agree with you that it is not easy to create un-structured mesh automatically when the geometry is very complex. (2). Based on my experience, the volume mesh would fail when the mesh generating process was nearly complete, if the surface mesh is not good enough. But this was because my geometry was extremely complex. (3). The only way around this problem is to cut the domain into smaller pieces first. And then try to generate good surface mesh for each bolcks. Good surface meshes are essential for the successful generation of the volume mesh. I think, there are lot of rooms for good automatic mesh generation code.

 September 17, 1999, 13:01 Re: Scale Problem and Moving Walls in PCube/TGrid/Fluent #9 Joern Beilke Guest   Posts: n/a I tried Tetra some time ago, so things may have changed a bit. Surface meshes are just fine if they come from a solid modelling cad package. I always used stl-files, but IGES works (some people told me that they only use iges). Bad iges files (from catia) will always cause some problems and additional work. But they should have a cad repair tool by now. The prism mesher worked when we tried it but I have no comparison to Tgrid there. It is very important to attend a course, because ICEM Tetra/Hexa/... are very powerfull tools. They also have native interfaces to some cad packages (unigraphics, proe, ??). There are no more problems with a bad surface description any more because it works directly on the cad data.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Geon-Hong FLUENT 3 April 5, 2010 03:24 G. SE Siemens 2 May 7, 2008 07:15 rolando OpenFOAM Bugs 8 March 23, 2007 07:18 walid Siemens 6 April 1, 2005 17:31 Arnab Siemens 3 August 16, 2004 08:59

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:09.