|
[Sponsors] |
Implicit or explicit treatment of convective terms |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
I've been reading some papers and most of them tend to treat diffusive terms implicitly and convective terms explicitly. Regarding the treatment of convective terms, may I know when is explicit or implicit treatment used? (Besides stability reason) Has it to do with the Reynolds no.? Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The main costraint is the stability. The diffusive term is the most costraining so you can reach two targets in one shot (Treating Diff -> Impl / Conv -> Expl):
Greatly relax the stability costraint and let the system of equations arised from the implicit treatment of the diffusive term remain linear. The Re number clearly affects the stability so, the same as above. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Implicit versus Explicit | Deepak | Main CFD Forum | 17 | November 7, 2015 13:14 |
Implicit treatment of advection terms and pressure correction | nikosb | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 17, 2010 16:07 |
Point implicit treatment of k-e source terms | andy | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 9, 2006 11:03 |
Euler (explicit or implicit) | anybody | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 8, 2006 02:12 |
implicit vs explicit | pXYZ | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 21, 2006 09:48 |