# numerical vs. ideal solutions

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 20, 1999, 15:10 numerical vs. ideal solutions #1 Gotfred Berntsen Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Hi ! I have a general question regarding CFD-solvers. If I do an inviscid calculation on a geometry with a known ideal solution, are there any reasons why the numerical solution would differ from the ideal solution based on stream function theory? My case is a 2D NACA 0015 hydrofoil, and I'm doing some preliminary calculations to get to know the solver (Fluent 5). The numerically calculated velocity ratio (v/V) tends to be 10% smaller than the ideal solutions based on equations from "theory of wing sections". Here v is local velocity at the surface, and V is free stream velocity. I have also done the same inviscid calculation to a 2D cylindrical geometry, and the same tendency appears here. (while maximum value of (v/V) should be 2, I get as low as 1.8) Gotfred Berntsen

 September 20, 1999, 15:34 Re: numerical vs. ideal solutions #2 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). I was asking question about whether CFD is science or art. (2). In old days, to be qualified as an engineering answer, the error must be less than 5%, because people were using slide rules. (3). I can only say that, try other codes to find out whether they all have the same characteristics. (4). If you start fooling around with the code and answer, then I guess the answer will be on the art side. (5). Last Friday, an engineer came to me and show me that he was getting the same wrong answer from the code. Earlier, I sent him a few pages of notes showing the wrong answer I got from the 3-D commercial code. (It is not too bad for you, it is only 10% off. ) (6). I would strongly suggest that you run a couple of more test cases to check out the code. There is not much one can do with a black box code. In industries, normally, there are many other codes available to double check the results. In most cases, test data are also available.

 September 22, 1999, 05:48 Re: numerical vs. ideal solutions #3 Antonio Filippone Guest   Posts: n/a Your inviscid solution should tend to the analytical ideal solution as you increase the size of your grid. It is hard to say whether you have wrong input files, wrong settings or wrong theory, but the statement above is a basic concept in CFD. Thin wing theory does not apply to an airfoil that is 15 % thick. I suggest that you do this: Take some analytical airfoils (ex. Van de Vooren), compute the analytical solution (your benchmark), change your Fluent input file, run the code with increasing grid size and compare (make sure you have no viscosity).

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post sonsiest Main CFD Forum 0 May 23, 2011 15:37 chriswatt Main CFD Forum 0 February 15, 2011 22:32 Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 12:02 ado Main CFD Forum 3 October 12, 2000 08:20 Eleuterio TORO Main CFD Forum 0 December 18, 1998 13:41