CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   Convergence based on Reynolds Number (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/13180-convergence-based-reynolds-number.html)

Dominic March 21, 2007 22:09

Convergence based on Reynolds Number
 
Hi,

The paper "Accurate Three Dimensional Lid-Driven cavity flow" J.comp.Phy 206(2005) 536-558 by Albensoeder & Kuhlmann, defines in Page 543, a Convergence criteria for steady flow as :

max( u(X,t) - u(X,t-dt) ) / dt*Re < epsilon, X is a vector here. My question is : Why is Reynolds number appearing here ?

Regs, Dominic


Paolo Lampitella March 22, 2007 07:32

Re: Convergence based on Reynolds Number
 
Is the Re number at numerator or denominator:

1) ( max ( u(X,t) - u(X,t-dt) ) / dt ) * Re

or

2) max ( u(X,t) - u(X,t-dt) ) / ( dt * Re )

?


Jonas Holdeman March 22, 2007 08:06

Re: Convergence based on Reynolds Number
 
Put in the definition of the Reynolds number in terms of the reference velocity and other things, and you will see that the criterion says that the incremental velocity in a time step needs to be small compared to the reference velocity. How small depends on the other things. This is to make the criterion independent of the velocity scale.

Dominic March 22, 2007 10:27

Re: Convergence based on Reynolds Number
 
In the Denominator

Dominic March 22, 2007 10:35

Re: Convergence based on Reynolds Number
 
Thanks, If we put in the dimensions of each quantity, i see that, the entire term goes as x/t^2 < epsilon ... where x, t are length and time scales respectively. Something like an acceleration ??

desA March 22, 2007 12:24

Re: Convergence based on Reynolds Number
 
max ( u(X,t) - u(X,t-dt) ) / ( dt * Re )

= max (u(X,t) - u(X,t-dt))/dt * (1/Re )

= acc * (1/Re)


'acc' represents the temporal acceleration, determined between two successive temporal-stations (time-snapshots) for a slowly-evolving solution. This term should go to zero as a steady solution is approached - if it exists.

I'm wondering why they multiply 'acc' by (1/Re)?

desA


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:48.