CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

how much variation in results of 2D and 3D simulation?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 13, 2014, 00:14
Question how much variation in results of 2D and 3D simulation?
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 5
annu is on a distinguished road
Hi friends,
My work is on 3D, but due to shortage of time i shifted to 2D. I wanna know is there is more variation in the results, and is 2D results are acceptable?
Is this possible in 3D, gas is dispersing in both sides from the release source and in 2D, it remains in one direction with same boundary conditions? am i doing wrong somewhere.

Any response is highly appreciated..
annu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2014, 03:17
Default
  #2
Member
 
venki
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 7
venkateshaero is on a distinguished road
We cant do simulate 2D for all cases. Please explain about your Geomerty and BC details
venkateshaero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2014, 03:30
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 5
annu is on a distinguished road
its a tunnel of 1000 m.
annu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2014, 03:35
Default
  #4
Member
 
venki
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 7
venkateshaero is on a distinguished road
WInd Tunnel?
venkateshaero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2014, 03:39
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 5
annu is on a distinguished road
transportation tunnel (road)

basically gas is released from a hole which is at centre of the tunnel means at 500 m.
b.c. for release source is mass flow inlet
outlet are pressure outlet

Last edited by wyldckat; June 7, 2014 at 08:54. Reason: merged two posts, since they were posted a few minutes apart
annu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2014, 04:41
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,700
Rep Power: 33
FMDenaro will become famous soon enoughFMDenaro will become famous soon enough
The key is that 2d assumption has a fundamental constraint on the vorticity evolution, no stretching exists. This is fundamental in DNS/LES where 3D is mandatory (apart some geophysical flows...)
You can simulate 2d turbulent flows in the statistical meaning (URANS), provided that your problem is consistent to such assumption.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2014, 05:09
Default
  #7
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 5
annu is on a distinguished road
FM denaro: I have done some work on 3D its is dispersing on both sides, I used standard k-epsilon model in both cases, but in 2D it is flowing in one side..its unsteady state problem.

.
And you mean that it is not possible to
simulate in 2D if i want to check concentration in longitudinal directions.??

Thankyou for replying
annu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2014, 05:33
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,700
Rep Power: 33
FMDenaro will become famous soon enoughFMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by annu View Post
FM denaro: I have done some work on 3D its is dispersing on both sides, I used standard k-epsilon model in both cases, but in 2D it is flowing in one side..its unsteady state problem.

.
And you mean that it is not possible to
simulate in 2D if i want to check concentration in longitudinal directions.??

Thankyou for replying

without details is not possible to give you an answer ... is your flow problem incompressible and turbulent? you have a geometry that has a 2d geometry elonged in the spanwise direction? are you sure that the statistical fields are unsteady? in any case you can switch to URANS.

what do you mean for "to check concentration"?
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2014, 02:12
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Marek Chodorski
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Poland
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 5
marek_ac is on a distinguished road
Hi,
It is better to do it in 3D.
Here you have equation (description is in polish)

http://feazone.org/readarticle.php?article_id=11

and sample results:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...is_a1_test.gif
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...is_a2_test.gif

animation at the bottom of the page (with description):
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modelow...odorant%C3%B3w

Regards,
Marek
marek_ac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2014, 07:53
Default
  #10
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 5
annu is on a distinguished road
FM Denero : I am using species transport without reaction. I am checking mass fraction profiles of gas in longitudinal and transversal direction of the tunnel.

Marek: U mean 2 D results are not acceptable? I dont have much time..

Thankyou
annu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2014, 08:38
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Marek Chodorski
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Poland
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 5
marek_ac is on a distinguished road
Hi Annu,
If it is Wind Tunnel with simple geometry - like a pipe - 2D is OK
but if you use transportation tunnel - like a urban canyon - 3D would be much better.
Regards,
Marek
marek_ac is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:55.