CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

CFD using Finite Elements

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 6, 2007, 00:19
Default CFD using Finite Elements
Manav Bhatia
Posts: n/a

I am planning on working on a FE based CFD solution for compressible flows. Being new to CFD, I started with the third volume of Zienkiewicz's book "Finite Element Method" where he has described a CBS algorithm. In the book, the authors have strongly advocated its use, and say that this is a generic algorithm and can be used for any kind of flow.

The algorithms consists of 4 steps: step1: approximate new mass flux using the momentum equations step2: calculate new pressures step3: correct mass flux step4: solve energy equations This algorithm involves solving multiple systems of equations.

I have a few questions: -- Has anyone on this mailing list had any experience with this algorithm? -- As I understand, the multiple steps arise out of an attempt to obtain the optimal variational formulation of the PDEs so that simple Galerkin discretization could be used. This is obtained by employing a characteristic based flux split. What other generic formulations lead to a single system of equations instead of a multistep algorithm? How do these match-up against this CBS-Galerkin algorithm?

Regards, Manav

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2007, 04:22
Default Re: CFD using Finite Elements
Praveen. C
Posts: n/a
I dont know enough to give you a comparison but for compressible flows, you may want to check out SUPG finite element method and discontinuous galerkin method.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2007, 23:37
Default Re: CFD using Finite Elements
jinwon park
Posts: n/a
I tried to do like the way you mentioned. But the FE is not good enough to capture the shock in compressible flow. The way I accomplised was the flux-corrected transport. It showed a shock-captured profile but too diffusive compared to the FV approximation. Now, I am using the discontinuous Galerkin method(DGM) which is the combination of advantages of FE and FV. Its performace was superior to any FE approximation in the simulation of compressible flow. Any FE-based compressible flow solver must be not better than the FV-based compressible flow. Try the DGM or FV for compressible fluid flow if you want to get the sharp shock capturing.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD Salary CFD Main CFD Forum 17 January 3, 2017 18:09
sliding mesh with Finite elements or finite volume tool Main CFD Forum 0 October 9, 2008 10:07
ASME CFD Symposium Chris Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2001 06:41
CFD JOBS and Expected Salary.... Noel Harrison Main CFD Forum 11 November 22, 2000 08:15
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, 22-26 July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 1, 2000 10:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:20.