CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Fluent 5.0 boundary condition issue with RSM

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 18, 1999, 18:37
Default Fluent 5.0 boundary condition issue with RSM
  #1
Flav
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm in a french school of engineering, and I'm studying the 2D test case of a flate plate boundary layer with RSM model.

I have some experiment data from Smith and Smits experiment : the velocity inlet is defined by profiles for : u, v, uu, vv, ww, uv.

The purpose of my study is to modelise this particular boundary layer.

The issue that I can't manage to solve is the following : the profiles for uu, vv, and ww all should start at zero, from an experimental point of view.

Therefore, I put a point at the beginning of the all profiles, which coordinates are : x:0, y:0 uu:0 (the same for vv and ww). But when i plot uu=f(y), i can see that uu, vv and ww don't equal zero at the wall contact. Very strange, since the .prof files specifie that it should ! Why doesn't Fluent agree to set the wall values to zero ???

Thanks in advance if you can help. Flav
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 1999, 00:40
Default Re: Fluent 5.0 boundary condition issue with RSM
  #2
david
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Flav,

Because of the control volume method Fluent takes, the data you see is the average value of the control volume near the boundary, not the boundary value you specified. I think the Fluent reference books do not explain this clearly.

You can plot the boundary value using Fluent's XY plot option. I believe you can see the correct results.

Regards, david

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 1999, 05:57
Default Re: Fluent 5.0 boundary condition issue with RSM
  #3
Flav
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear David,

First of all thanks a lot for answering my question. You're right when you say that what i see is the average value near the boundary layer. But in my case, the trouble is that it's not an average problem, since the value of uu set by Fluent at 0.0 is 6.0, whereas the whole profile should never exceed 4 according to my fluent .prof file !

In Fluent, i use the XYPLOT function, then i look at the Inlet profiles : 1) for velocity magnitude 2) for uu Reynolds stresses

Both of them where initialized at the inlet using .prof files. Both start by :

(x (0.0 .....)) (y (0.0 .....)) (u (0.0 .....)) or (uu (0.0 .....))

The fact is that it works fine for u, but not for uu. Has Fluent got a special treatment for the latter which could explain my problem ?

(Note that in XYPlot, turning On/Off the "Node value" option doesn't make a huge difference.

Cheers Flav

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Commercial meshers] icem fluent mesh with cyclic boundary condition jiejie OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 February 24, 2020 04:34
Handling boundary condition in Fluent sak FLUENT 6 March 25, 2013 16:21
inlet velocity boundary condition murali CFX 5 August 3, 2012 09:56
vorticity boundary condition bearcharge Main CFD Forum 0 May 14, 2010 12:32
How to use a solution as an inlet boundary condition in another problem in fluent geryes FLUENT 0 February 25, 2010 17:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:29.