 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
November 2, 2007, 03:59
|
upwind scheme
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
I am runing the symmetric and upwind TVD schemes at Mach < 3. In papers I've read(Yee, Harten), the Mach number can be hypersonic. However my code keeps blowing up at Ma > 5. The numerical method is the same for high and low Mach flows so I am unsure as to why it doesn't work. Is it to do with CFL? Shuo |
|
|
||
|
November 2, 2007, 05:19
|
Re: upwind scheme
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
find Quirk's article "Debate on great Riemann solver..." he wrote about "carbuncle phenomina" for M>6
|
|
|
|
||
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 13:29 |
| Use of upwind scheme for interpolation of u/v | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 6 | August 30, 2011 05:10 |
| Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! | Far | CFX | 9 | May 31, 2011 09:21 |
| 2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) | Far | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2011 02:50 |
| Drag comparison upwind vs. scheme | Luk_Fiz | CFX | 3 | April 27, 2009 22:42 |
Linear Mode
