CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Lax wendroff and Maccormack

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 19, 2007, 15:17
Default Lax wendroff and Maccormack
  #1
prapanj
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I tried solving linear advection equation using lax wendroff and maccormack schemes. the initial condition was a step. In the solution I could see numerical oscillations only on the left side of the step. There was no dispersion on the right side of the step. (the wave speed is positive constant for my problem). What could be the reason for this?

thanking you

prapanj
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2007, 05:02
Default Re: Lax wendroff and Maccormack
  #2
emcas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi

These oscillation are typical for method used, therefore only natural, to remedy this problem you need to add an artificial viscosity to damp these oscillations, otherwise you can use a scheme of Roe with a limiter adequate
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2007, 05:59
Default Re: Lax wendroff and Maccormack
  #3
Praveen. C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Look for definitions of lagging and leading phase error.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2007, 13:18
Default Re: Lax wendroff and Maccormack
  #4
prapanj
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi I was asking the reason for the oscillations occuring only on one side. thank u
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difference between Lax and MacCormack methods on solutions of 1D problem. AERO Main CFD Forum 2 January 19, 2000 14:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:04.