 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
January 15, 2008, 07:33
|
Comparing 2 CFD softwares
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am planning to get a basic course of CFD in my country.
I would like to know what are the advantages each of the following 2 CFD softwares, FLUENT and PHOENICS. And I would like to know, can PHOENICS be able to display and analyze 3D object? Thanks in advance |
|
|
||
|
January 15, 2008, 09:45
|
Re: Comparing 2 CFD softwares
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think it depends upon what you want do with the code afterwards? For a more general insight into CFD I would prefer FLUENT oder PHOENICS because of its larger user community.
|
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Geometry import into CFD softwares | Vivek | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 14, 2006 23:00 |
| Comparing wind tunnel tests costs with CFD | Freeman | Main CFD Forum | 9 | January 30, 2006 08:02 |
| CFD Softwares ??? | Jim | Main CFD Forum | 4 | September 12, 2004 08:47 |
| ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 04:49 |
| Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |
Linear Mode
