CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Flat plate CFD

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 18, 2015, 03:22
Default Flat plate CFD
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
soria is on a distinguished road
Hi

I am trying to model the laminar flow past a flat plate and have 3 questions.

1) If I select a constant density and material under the material properties, does this mean that FLUENT is solving the incompressible governing equations? The solution should be comparable to that of Blasius (1908).


2) If I select ideal gas under the material properties, does this mean that FLUENT is using the compressible governing equations? The solution should be comparable to that of van Driest (1952).

3) I am using a symmetry boundary condition for the top of the rectangular computational domain, this imposes a slight streamwise pressure gradient on the laminar flow. Are there any other options I could use to ensure a zero streamwise pressure gradient?


Cheers

Soria
soria is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2015, 10:50
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Troy Snyder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 18
tas38 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by soria View Post
Hi

I am trying to model the laminar flow past a flat plate and have 3 questions.

1) If I select a constant density and material under the material properties, does this mean that FLUENT is solving the incompressible governing equations? The solution should be comparable to that of Blasius (1908).


2) If I select ideal gas under the material properties, does this mean that FLUENT is using the compressible governing equations? The solution should be comparable to that of van Driest (1952).

3) I am using a symmetry boundary condition for the top of the rectangular computational domain, this imposes a slight streamwise pressure gradient on the laminar flow. Are there any other options I could use to ensure a zero streamwise pressure gradient?


Cheers

Soria
1. Yes and yes
2. Yes and yes
3. I am not sure how the symmetry boundary condition imposed on the upper wall of
the computational domain (normal to the streamwise direction) results in a slight
pressure gradient in the streamwise direction? Seems as though the pressure gradient
may be due to the boundary conditions at inlet and outlet of the domain.
tas38 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 19, 2015, 06:01
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Cees Haringa
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Delft
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 0
CeesH is on a distinguished road
Doesn't the symmetry mean that basically, you have a domain which represents a flow between 2 flat plates? The small streamwise pressure gradient would then be the pressure drop due to friction right?

Anyway, does the streamwise pressure drop significantly affect the solution?
an alternative may be using a 0-shear wall or a far-field fixed pressure...
CeesH is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flat Plate Drag & Lift Joe Main CFD Forum 3 October 24, 2008 14:17
PIV - transitional flat plate flows MC Main CFD Forum 0 July 4, 2007 08:21
Turbulent Flat Plate Validation Case Jonas Larsson Main CFD Forum 0 April 2, 2004 10:25
Free convection flow over vertical flat plate Polly Main CFD Forum 1 February 11, 2003 13:25
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:55.