CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Numerical problem?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

View Poll Results: a
b 2 66.67%
c 1 33.33%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 8, 2015, 06:59
Default Numerical problem?
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 12
VisMart is on a distinguished road
Hi everybody,

I need your help with an issue. I have been dealing with it for a long time and I don’t understand what exactly happening.

I am working in the development of a compressible CFD code and we are now trying to validate it with a test case from NASA (http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/naca0012_val.html) of the NACA0012 airfoil. The mesh is the “unstructured family II” with 2x1793x513 nodes (http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/naca...ics_grids.html). The case I am running is the same at the first webpage, with angle of attack of 0º. Riemann invariants are applied to boundary conditions in our code.

As can be seen in picture, it seems like numerical oscillations are appearing in the outflow boundary and this is perturbing the convergence upstream. I don’t know if it could be due to the aspect ratio of cells near the outflow boundary. The code works successfully with a coarser grid of Naca0012, meshed by ourselves (without grid for boundary layer).

Do anyone know what could be happening and what could be a solution of the problem?

Thank you guys!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg oscillations.jpg (54.3 KB, 28 views)
VisMart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 9, 2015, 16:12
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
nm
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 13
nvarma is on a distinguished road
just curious, what turbulence model are you using? and how are the turbulence BC at the outlet set up?
nvarma is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 20, 2015, 03:39
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 12
VisMart is on a distinguished road
Hi nvarma,

thanks for answering. I am using the Spalart-Allmaras model with the usual B.C. (nu_tilda=3*nu) at farfield. I have done some changes in the code and I have solved partially the problem, but it is still doing weird things at outflow boundary. Now I have compiled it with real variables in double precision, and changed the two outflow surfaces (by defect in NASA grid) to one (because there were two repited nodes and they were generating problems). Now it seems like the convergence is advancing because the solution starts to be as it should, but suddenly the outflow pressure decay and then gives negative pressure. I don't know what to do...

thanks for help!
VisMart is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stefan problem using fluent Isaacibp1401 Fluent Multiphase 2 June 7, 2021 05:49
wrong SU2 calculation for lift and drag coefficient for NAC4421 mechy SU2 7 January 9, 2017 05:18
UDF compiling problem Wouter Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 6 June 6, 2012 04:43
Can I solve this problem by Fluent? Kai_kc FLUENT 1 October 27, 2010 05:29
Numerical solution to the rotating disk problem? johny Main CFD Forum 7 September 5, 2005 05:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:38.