|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hello,
I am currently trying to determine the turbulent velocity profile with matlab for a flow between two parallel plates. In order to do so, I am using the universal velocity profiles of Karman and Taylor/Prandtl. The veloityprofile is considered to be symmetric. In both cases the velocity gradients close to the walls show realistic behaviour. Still I have my doubts concerning the values on the centerline where the velocity profile shows a peak. Does anyone know models which represent a smoother transition on the centerline or rather a better approximation for high y+ numbers? A plot of the velocity profile and the corresponding Matlabcode can be found in the appendix. Every input is welcome ![]() Greetings P_P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,053
Rep Power: 75 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Hello, I suggest plotting the velocity u+ versus y+ so that you can better check for viscous sub-layer and log region |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,053
Rep Power: 75 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
to check further, you can superimpose the law u+=y+ and the log law using a logarithmic scale |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#5 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
I don't know if I unterstood you well. I have created a semilogarithmic plot u+ versus y+. What is the idea behind checking the laminar sublayer for my problem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,459
Rep Power: 50 ![]() ![]() |
Looks reasonable.
The "peak" in your initial figure is due to the fact that the equations you used are for the flow over a flat plate with an infinite fluid domain. Not for a fluid between parallel plates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hello flotus1,
thanks for your reply. Do you know any models which offer a better desciription of the velocity profile between two parallel plates? Or is it unevitable to excute a CFD simulation with common CFD software in order to export the velocity profile. P_P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,459
Rep Power: 50 ![]() ![]() |
I havent come across any analytical formula for this case.
However there is plenty of DNS data available for turbulent flow between 2 parallel flat plates. Here is just one example... |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| log law, matlab, turbulent flow |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows | Jade M | CFX | 18 | September 15, 2022 08:08 |
| Nusselt Number for flow between flat parallel plates | vijud25 | FLUENT | 2 | November 23, 2015 13:29 |
| turbulent or laminar flow | student2008 | Main CFD Forum | 5 | August 24, 2013 06:33 |
| Turbulent Flow in Straight Square Duct - k-ep Validation | mcclud | STAR-CCM+ | 2 | August 7, 2012 17:56 |
| Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 13:19 |