CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

L1 norm in discontinuous Galerkin Method (DGM)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Sergio Rossi

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 4, 2008, 21:53
Default L1 norm in discontinuous Galerkin Method (DGM)
jinwon park
Posts: n/a
Unfortunately, I could not achieve desired orders of accuracy but results are converged. My guess is that the way to measure L1 norm is not right. Could anyone advice me how to measure L1 norm in DGM applications?

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2008, 14:50
Default Re: L1 norm in discontinuous Galerkin Method (DGM)
Sergio Rossi
Posts: n/a
Hi, Jinwon,

I'm also new to the world of DGFEM, so don't take my words for granted. L1, L2, L_inf, etc. norms in DGFEM are defined in pretty the same way they're defined in FEM. Maybe your problem could be that in DGFEM the solution in each element is an high order polynomial: if you limit yourself to second order, then there's no reason to go DGFEM because the number of degrees of freedom is way higher than for FEM, and the nonlinear stability could be achieved more cheaply using streamline upwinding or other methods. Due to the high order of the polynomial approximation, you can't compute the L1 norm using simply the value of the solution at the element centroid times the element measure. You have to compute the integral of the absolute valute of the solution over each element and sum all the integrals. Depending on the problem that you are solving, there may be ways to reduce the computational cost of the integration (expecially true for linear problems). However, I would first of all look at the way the numerical flux, the boundary conditions, the numerical integration and the timestepping are implemented in your code. DG isn't trivial to code and there's a lot which needs to be taken care of in order to get the correct high convergence rates. However it is necessary to do that, because using DG without getting the high accuracy is basically pointless.

Best regards,

Quasar_89 likes this.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Code for Discontinuous Galerkin Method ? Ameya J Main CFD Forum 2 April 21, 2011 05:45
Weak statement for Galerkin Method rugabug Main CFD Forum 0 March 26, 2010 20:19
Discontinuous Galerkin method Troy Main CFD Forum 1 October 29, 2007 04:27
Discontinuous Galerkin finite element method Tony Main CFD Forum 0 May 27, 2003 18:48
Discontinuous Galerkin Method Agus Suryanto Main CFD Forum 1 November 19, 1998 08:36

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:43.