|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
I have just started reading about dual time stepping. I want to implement the Weiss and smith preconditioner, with dual time-stepping to maintain temporal accuracy. I have 1 fundamental doubt When the multistage algorithm for the dual time stepping is implemented, how do we know that d/d(tau)(..)=0? I understand how backward difference is used for the physical time term and how the residual is calculated etc. How many stages should there be to ensure convergence of the dual-time stepping? Thanks Srinath |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
you can decide wether d/d(tau)(..)=0 is achieved or not by either 1) monitering residual for each inner loop (that is each intermediate steady state problem) and this residual computation is same as you do for a normal implicit procedure to solve a steady state problem. 2) Or you can say d/d(tau)(..)=0 is achieved just by some experince that it may achieve after N no of iterations (this method helps you to get rid of additional residual computation). Thanks, vinayender. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TimeVaryingMappedFixedValue | irishdave | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 33 | March 16, 2025 06:04 |
time stepping schemes for compressible DNS/LES | shyamdsundar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 14, 2010 23:15 |
Convergence moving mesh | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | November 19, 2007 14:09 |
autosave at flow time with adaptive time stepping | Ybes | FLUENT | 0 | November 3, 2007 12:32 |
local time stepping and pseudo time | phil | Fidelity CFD | 0 | February 27, 2006 16:26 |