|July 2, 2015, 00:39||
How does the dissipation of a supersonic underexpanded jet depend on grid fineness
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 16Rep Power: 3
I have recently tried to simulate the acceleration due to friction in the a micro channel flow. I find that even though the peak mach numbers match up with previous experiments, the jet breakdown occurs much sooner than expected.
This gives birth to the question on whether the making the grid finer near the nozzle exit and continuing till the boundary would help carry on the jet further, how influential would this be.
In my understanding, having a high aspect ratio cell would lead to more dissipation, can anyone help me in understanding how much effect would the cell aspect ratio would have on the jet breakdown.
|July 2, 2015, 07:50||
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,903Rep Power: 34
In any simulation, the grid refinement assessment is a good job ;-)
however, many other issues can affect the solution, such as BC.s
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|2d axisymmetric simulation of supersonic jet on liquid surface using VOF model||DKanungo||Fluent Multiphase||0||June 20, 2014 02:15|
|Re: Underexpanded jet BC||kiran||Main CFD Forum||2||December 26, 2010 13:17|
|underexpanded supersonic jet||shuo||Main CFD Forum||0||July 15, 2007 03:14|
|Supersonic jet||Philippe||Main CFD Forum||2||September 9, 2004 10:49|
|Turbulence model for supersonic jet||Danny Tandra||Main CFD Forum||3||August 24, 2001 04:10|