
[Sponsors] 
September 4, 2015, 08:45 
RANS model

#1 
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 
Hi everyoone,
I'm using a RANS model, with kepsilon turbulence model (IH2VOF). One of the options in the model setup is to 'activate turbulence' and then specify 3 parameters (turbulence seed parameter, eddy viscosity and a parameter for boundary layer turbulence). My question is if I choose not to include turbulence what is happening to the equations? they became NS? Many thanks 

September 10, 2015, 23:40 

#2 
Member
Jingchang.Shi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hang Zhou, China
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 14 


September 11, 2015, 03:40 

#3  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,839
Rep Power: 73 
Quote:
that's not always true... without any turbulence model you have the original NS equations and turbulent flows obey to such equations...and DNS allows us to simulate turbulence from NS without any "artificial" inclusion of turbulence in the equations 

September 11, 2015, 05:39 

#4 
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. The model is RANS but I'm not activating the turbulence option. The model runs well and of course no turbulence output files are created. However, when I plot the velocity files (sqrt(U^2+V^2)), figure in attach, vortices clear appear near the structure that I'm modeling. So my question is, since I didn´t activate the turbulence, these vortices are only due to molecular diffusion? I'm supposing that the equations remain RANS but the velocity components will not include the fluctuations (Reynolds tensor will be zero)? Another doubt:the molecular diffusion is not part of the fluctuations (I´m not sure on this)? Finally, even if vortices appear in the figure probably I'll have to conclude that these velocities are overestimated since dissipation due to turbulence was not included in the simulation? Thanks in advance for your help! 

September 11, 2015, 05:44 

#5  
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 
Quote:
Please check my reply above/below 

September 11, 2015, 05:45 

#6  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,839
Rep Power: 73 
Quote:
if you are using the steady 2D RANS formulation you have necessarily activated a turbulence model.... otherwise your solution has no physical meaning 

September 11, 2015, 05:49 

#7  
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 
Quote:
Quote:


September 11, 2015, 05:50 

#8 
Member
Jingchang.Shi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hang Zhou, China
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 14 
According to definition, vortices are generated due to velocity gradients, instead of diffusion.


September 11, 2015, 06:41 

#9 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,839
Rep Power: 73 

September 11, 2015, 06:50 

#10 
Member
Jingchang.Shi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hang Zhou, China
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 14 
I guess FMDenaro means that you need to supply some terms like mixing length scale to close the equations since RANS introduces new terms.


September 11, 2015, 06:50 

#11 
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 
Dear Filippo, I have posted my second reply (with a figure) but I guess you have already seen it.
If turbulence has to be supplied I still don't understand why in the model interface is available the option 'activate turbulence' 

September 11, 2015, 06:58 

#12  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,839
Rep Power: 73 
Quote:
I don't know the code you are using, it depends on what "activate turbulence" means in the user guide ... that's for sure that RANS without any turbulence modelling has no physical meaning 

Tags 
rans modelling, turbulence model 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13  msrinath80  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  18  March 3, 2015 05:36 
coalChemistryFoam: "Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??:?"  musabai  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  2  February 20, 2015 14:07 
manualInjection model in sprayFoam  Mentalo  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  1  April 2, 2014 09:29 
RANS vs.LES turbulence model  usker  Siemens  1  April 3, 2008 18:38 
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable kepsilon Model  Jonas Larsson  FLUENT  5  March 13, 2000 03:27 