|September 6, 2015, 10:15||
SPH vs FVM
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34Rep Power: 9
Hello dear colleagues
My way had born the question
Does have sense to solve TECFLAM-burner case in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) solver instead of some FVM solver, like OpenFOAM or Fluent?
the TECFLAM case is here
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) and its solvers is here
I start to work with SPH because it has more prospectives and it has more "white spots" comparing with FVM solvers.
So I guess, what chances has SPH method applied to usual field of FVM solvers?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Practical difference between FVM and LBM?||pharg_yrartibra||Main CFD Forum||2||November 25, 2013 11:52|
|FVM in 1-D spherical coordinates||lost.identity||Main CFD Forum||0||January 17, 2011 10:06|
|SPHysics or other free SPH codes||Henrike||OpenFOAM||2||June 8, 2010 03:31|
|comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM||kenn||Main CFD Forum||2||July 18, 2004 18:28|
|References for FVM||Anthony Wachs||Main CFD Forum||8||February 20, 2002 20:23|