|
[Sponsors] |
September 6, 2015, 11:15 |
SPH vs FVM
|
#1 |
Member
Michail
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello dear colleagues
My way had born the question Does have sense to solve TECFLAM-burner case in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) solver instead of some FVM solver, like OpenFOAM or Fluent? the TECFLAM case is here http://qnet-ercoftac.cfms.org.uk/w/index.php/AC_2-06 Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) and its solvers is here https://wiki.manchester.ac.uk/spheri....php/Main_Page I start to work with SPH because it has more prospectives and it has more "white spots" comparing with FVM solvers. So I guess, what chances has SPH method applied to usual field of FVM solvers? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Practical difference between FVM and LBM? | pharg_yrartibra | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 25, 2013 11:52 |
FVM in 1-D spherical coordinates | lost.identity | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 17, 2011 10:06 |
SPHysics or other free SPH codes | Henrike | OpenFOAM | 2 | June 8, 2010 04:31 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 19:28 |
References for FVM | Anthony Wachs | Main CFD Forum | 8 | February 20, 2002 20:23 |