CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Log-Law on Boundary Layer using Fluent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 28, 2008, 08:07
Default Log-Law on Boundary Layer using Fluent
Posts: n/a
Hello everyone,

I am using Fluent to try to simulate the evolution of a turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate of 30 cm of length with a freestream velocity of 5 m/s (2D-Steady state).

The mesh is such as : Dx=1mm and Dy=y+ at the wall

I've made a theoritical turbulent boundary profile for the velocity inlet condition. This profil follows the regular laws, as :

--> U+=y+ [close to the wall]

--> U+=1/0.41*ln(y+)+5 [At the log region]

--> The deficient law of Coles farther from the wall

I ran some simulations using k-eps model with a wall function until the residuals are small enough (< 10e-8). When I compare the numerical results at several x locations with the log law, it doesn't match at all.

Has someone have done something similar ?

Thank you !


  Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2008, 05:34
Default Re: Log-Law on Boundary Layer using Fluent
Bikini Girl with Machinegun
Posts: n/a
I've done a bit with the log-law.

Remember, Coles' function does not satisfy boundary conditions at the outer edge of the BL. Does that affect your CFD model?

Also, Coles' log-law constants are very dodgy. He obtained the values for kappa and B_0 using massaged velocity profile data. Sadly, his values are often still treated as universal constants by noobs.

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2008, 06:07
Default Re: Log-Law on Boundary Layer using Fluent
Posts: n/a
Actually I thought that wall functions in the RANS models were made to make the flow to fit the sub-layer law and log-law with the "universal" constants.

At the entrance, my theoritical profile is such

U+ = 1/0.41 * ln(y+) + 5 [for 10 < y+ < 60]

When I get profiles at some location after the simulations, they all fit in a profile such as :

U+ = 1/0.41 * ln(y+) + 0.3 [for 10 < y+ < 30]

I was wondering if this was coming from the fact that I am simulating a Low Reynolds boundary layer (Rtheta ~ 600). I made a simulation with a higher velocity (and so a different boundary layer at the entrance) at U=100m/s instead of 5m/s and I found the same results...
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2008, 11:08
Default Re: Log-Law on Boundary Layer using Fluent
Posts: n/a
After trying different mesh, different profiles at the velocity inlet and different models I found that the best model to simulate the evolution of a turbulent boundary layer is K-EPS --> Realizable --> Enhanced wall treatment.

Using this, the profile of velocity fits the log law fairly well;

Besides, the first cell doesn't have to be too small (> y+)
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[GAMBIT] problems in boundary layer yubaibai88 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 8 April 19, 2010 21:07
GAMBIT problem with 3D Boundary Layer when meshing Anthony Haroutunian FLUENT 2 March 26, 2008 03:02
Can FLUENT calculate the boundary layer accurately Bob FLUENT 2 August 25, 2007 01:23
help for Gambit: 2 edges + 1 boundary layer Peter FLUENT 0 August 9, 2002 19:41
boundary layer thickness 98.4F Main CFD Forum 1 December 29, 2000 08:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:07.