
[Sponsors] 
December 1, 1999, 23:37 
SIMPLE for NonNewtonain Flow ?

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Sponsored Links


Sponsored Links 
December 2, 1999, 13:03 
Re: SIMPLE for NonNewtonain Flow ?

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

i know the CMOLD software for simulating flows of thermoplastics which are definitely non newtonian uses a pressure based method. i don't know which one though. perhaps you can contact them and ask. that might help you


December 3, 1999, 17:16 
Re: SIMPLE for NonNewtonain Flow ?

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

What kind of grid and geometry are you using? 2D or 3D? CMOLD only has 2.5D product for nonNewtonian polymer.


December 5, 1999, 21:10 
Re: SIMPLE for NonNewtonain Flow ?

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

CMOLD is a generalized heleshaw approach, that is ,only a pressure possion equation is sovled. My problems was encountered during solving primitive variables Navier Stokes equation by FVM(or more correctly by SIMPLE) on either 2D or 3D grid in the simulation of highly nonlinear GNF flow.


December 5, 1999, 23:08 
Re: SIMPLE for NonNewtonain Flow ?

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

(1). Looks like that "SIMPLE" is not always very simple. (2). If what you are doing is somethin new, that is, you are not following any published paper or approach, then you are on you own. (3). Convergence rate depends on many parameters, so, it is not easy to pin point the source of the slow convergence rate. (4). Since you are satisfied with your Newtonian model, I would suggest that, you focus on the effect of the NonNewtonian model effect first. That is, first simply the problem and then try to identify the sources affecting the convergence rate. (5). So, you are free to use any available methods to speed up the convergence of your NonNewtonian model. At the same time, you can try to do journal paper search to see whether you can find the similar cases. It is always helpful to mention the paper or the article you are following, so that the reader can dig it up if it is easily available.


December 6, 1999, 04:37 
Re: SIMPLE for NonNewtonain Flow ?

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi.
I have been doing computer simulation of NonNewtonian fluid flow. It is good to know that somebody is doing similar thing like what I do. Actually, I am using FEM instead. You problem is very well known in NonNewtonian flow simulation and it also has been bothering me a lot. Basically, there is no sophicated cure for that. However, there are some laborous ways that I found from literature survey and also from trial and error. (1) use increment techniques start with Newtonian case or NonNewtian case(n>0.6) and gradually decrease power index down to number you want. (2) use Picard type solver Due to strong nonlinearity in viscous flux as n is close to zero, your initial condition(starting point) is very reasonable to get solutions. However, it is not that easy as you know. Therefore, at first of a few iterations(about 10) you need to move your intermediate solutions sufficiently close to real solutions using Picard type method which is less efficient but has larger radius of convergence. And then, switch to standard linear matrix solver imbedded in SIMPLE (I think it is TDMA). It is strongly true for my case in which I use NewtonRaphson method for nonlinear FEM equations and then use GMRES matrix solver. (3) use relaxation factor I think SIMPLE uses some level of relaxation factor during iteration. You may need stronger relaxation like 0.2 if you move your power index close to 0. Unfortunately none of the methods above does not promise guarantee convergence. In FEM case NonNewton fluid flow simluations started in early 80's with power law fluid model, but there was not satisfactory improvement for lower power index case. It is very difficult to get solutions when n < 0.2, people usually do when n > 0.25. In my cases, I usually do when n > 0.4 because below 0.4 I still have convergence problem. JK. 

December 8, 1999, 14:37 
Re: SIMPLE for NonNewtonain Flow ?

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi, JK
I am a beginner for CFD. I am trying to write some codes for steady incompressible NS equations. I tried many ways to solve the following simplest example: given a cavity, 2 sides are wall (u=v=0), 2 sides are provided by pressure p0 and p. And also Newtonian fluid is assumed, convective term is omitted. All the standard algorithm: FDM, CVM, FEM will give singularity concerning continuity equation. Delta . v = 0 I just want to know what tricks have you made when you developed your FEM code. Do you use SUPG and PSPG FEM algorithm? Or add bubble function for velocity? I appreciate your response. yangang bao 

December 9, 1999, 11:34 
Re: SIMPLE for NonNewtonain Flow ?

#8 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi..
If you do that, there will be indeterminecy in your incompressibility contraint. If you assign pressure, you need to assign velocity(any type, zero or nonzero). I am not quite sure about your configuration. It sounds like a lid driven cavity. If it is, I think you just need to put one contant pressure value at one of corner nodes in the cavity. For incompressible flow pressure is only appeared as gradient term like dp/dx, any value is possible. I am using SUPG and also pressure Poisson equation. JK 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
SIMPLE algorithm for compressible flow  and  Main CFD Forum  6  August 10, 2015 14:06 
Solve Simple foam for laminar flow  nandiganavishal  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  4  January 20, 2009 01:56 
Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows?  diaw  Main CFD Forum  104  February 16, 2006 06:44 
simple method for compressible flow  saeed  Main CFD Forum  0  April 24, 2003 02:20 
SIMPLE Cavity Flow  Kunal Jain  Main CFD Forum  1  August 26, 2001 11:43 
Sponsored Links 