|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all
I simulated fully supersonic flow of scramjet inlet along with cowl using openFOAM. I used RNGk-epsilon Turbulence Method to compute turbulence. My freestream mach number is in the range of 2-3. When i checked the y+ range, it came in the range of 10-600. Near the separation region y+ is very high. I dont know what range of y+ should be for RNGk-epsilon method. Can you please tell me how to calculate y+ ? Does anybody having idea about it ? - Velan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
K-epsilon models typically need a y+ of around 30 to be accurate as you're not trying to resolve the boundary layer. There's a lot of information about y+ located in the wiki. I find it a little odd, though, that you're reporting high y+ near a separated region inthat y+ is directly related to wall shear. Areas of low wallshear, such as within a separated region, typically have low y+ values.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is turbulence disripable by chaos? | Matthias | Main CFD Forum | 9 | March 27, 2001 13:04 |
Renormalization Group Method in Turbulence Model | wood | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 10, 2000 19:15 |
Turbulence by using MAC method | Valdemir G. Ferreira | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 20, 1999 09:33 |
Multigrid Method in Turbulence Modelling | Bipin Lokhande | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 11, 1998 19:20 |
turbulence modeling questions | llowen | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 11, 1998 04:24 |