# Boundary conditions for incompressible (total) energy equation

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 December 25, 2015, 05:37 Boundary conditions for incompressible (total) energy equation #1 Senior Member   Tom-Robin Teschner Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Cranfield, UK Posts: 203 Rep Power: 15 For an incompressible medium, we have the energy equation as follows: + (u)E = -up + u() My question is now, how do I define boundary conditions for certain boundary types, i.e. inlet, outlet and walls (lets assume a channel flow). More specifically (I presume I can use Neumann-type boundary conditions for the outlet and walls), do I have to prescribe the energy level at the inlet as a Dirichlet type? Since the total energy is the sum of potential, kinetic and internal energy, I can't see how that should be zero but I couldn't find a way to impose non-zero Dirichlet boundary values for the inlet. Unfortunately I couldn't find anything related to that here in the forum so I hope someone will know the answer here.

December 25, 2015, 08:20
#2
Senior Member

Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,675
Rep Power: 71
Quote:
 Originally Posted by t.teschner For an incompressible medium, we have the energy equation as follows: + (u)E = -up + u() My question is now, how do I define boundary conditions for certain boundary types, i.e. inlet, outlet and walls (lets assume a channel flow). More specifically (I presume I can use Neumann-type boundary conditions for the outlet and walls), do I have to prescribe the energy level at the inlet as a Dirichlet type? Since the total energy is the sum of potential, kinetic and internal energy, I can't see how that should be zero but I couldn't find a way to impose non-zero Dirichlet boundary values for the inlet. Unfortunately I couldn't find anything related to that here in the forum so I hope someone will know the answer here.

first, for incompressible flows you have often a decoupled energy equation expressed in terms of the temperature balance....

however, E is sum of kinetic and internal energy, the BC.s for E are consequent to the setting of BC.s for velocity and temperature

 December 25, 2015, 08:37 #3 Senior Member   Tom-Robin Teschner Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Cranfield, UK Posts: 203 Rep Power: 15 ok, what I want to know (did not mention that), can I compute the total energy equation independent from the temperature equation? And if so, can I (at the inlet), prescribe the total energy as the sum of kinetic and internal energy (based on inlet velocity and temperature) as a Dirichlet boundary condition, dropping the potential energy contribution?

December 25, 2015, 08:49
#4
Senior Member

Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,675
Rep Power: 71
Quote:
 Originally Posted by t.teschner ok, what I want to know (did not mention that), can I compute the total energy equation independent from the temperature equation? And if so, can I (at the inlet), prescribe the total energy as the sum of kinetic and internal energy (based on inlet velocity and temperature) as a Dirichlet boundary condition, dropping the potential energy contribution?

as you see from the equation, if you want to treat as a decoupled equation you need to know a-priori the velocity field and pressure gradient (steady or not). That means you already know the kinetic energy which is a part of the total energy. Therefore, the ony actual unknown field is the internal energy (the temperature)

 December 25, 2015, 19:59 #5 Senior Member   Tom-Robin Teschner Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Cranfield, UK Posts: 203 Rep Power: 15 and what is about the potential energy which also contributes to the total energy (negleted because contribution small?)? just out of interest then, can I solve the temperature and total energy equation if I already have obtained velocity and pressure beforehand? I mean, the energy equation is the general conservation law and the temperature equation is derived from it. So can I use both or just one equation?

 December 26, 2015, 05:16 #6 Senior Member   Filippo Maria Denaro Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 6,675 Rep Power: 71 the potential energy is very often disregarded in many problems ... My opinion is that for incompressible flows you need just to compute the temperature equation, then you sum the resulting internal energy to the (known) kinetic energy and get the total energy. I think it could be interesting computing the totale energy equation only for some special coupled cases (velocity field depending also on internal energy)

 December 26, 2015, 09:28 #7 Senior Member   Tom-Robin Teschner Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Cranfield, UK Posts: 203 Rep Power: 15 ok, i think that has clarified the topic for me, grazie mille

December 26, 2015, 09:33
#8
Senior Member

Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,675
Rep Power: 71
Quote:
 Originally Posted by t.teschner ok, i think that has clarified the topic for me, grazie mille
di nulla

 Tags energy equation, incompressible flows

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Saturn CFX 58 July 3, 2020 02:13 Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 07:20 Moinul Haque CFX 4 November 25, 2014 18:30 Anna Tian CFX 1 June 16, 2013 07:28 Tom Main CFD Forum 0 November 5, 2002 02:54

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top