|
[Sponsors] |
February 22, 2016, 13:56 |
NX10 Flow
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 10 |
Good afternoon.
I'm starting to use NX10 Flow, and I'm disappointed with the info provided by Siemens. I can't also find tutorials or any material. I'm trying to simulate a pipe with gravity effect, and I'm having some problems to check the hydrostatic pressure at my problem. First, I can activate buoyancy or not, and second I have boussinesq aproximation or Full Hydrostatic Pressure model. My results varies if I check or uncheck buoyancy, or I select one model or the other. Since I'm not taking into account heat or temperature, the boussinesq model should be discarded, but I'm still not sure why if I uncheck the buoyancy, the full hydrostatic pressure model, gravity is not taken into account. I know there is a reference bulk temperature, which I have set to 0, but I'm not sure how do this models work. Any advice is welcome! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 05:21 |
Different flow patterns in CFX and Fluent | avi@lpsc | FLUENT | 4 | April 8, 2012 06:12 |
Flow meter Design | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 3 | June 21, 2011 08:33 |
potential flow vs. Euler flow | curious ... | Main CFD Forum | 23 | July 21, 2006 07:40 |
Plug Flow | Franck | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 4, 2003 05:57 |