
[Sponsors] 
February 29, 2016, 13:06 
Conceptual doubt: If velocity is zero at the wall...

#1 
Senior Member
Jordi Pina
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 4 
Sponsored Links
maybe you can help me solving this doubt: If the velocity of a fluid is zero in the wall, why does the wall end by being in contact with the fluid? The fact is that I am simulating how a fluid moves near a wall, so I am simulating a very little region near the wall. I am using a velocity inlet with zero speed in the wall with very little velocities when being around 300nm away. But this leads to the fact that I need around 2 seconds for the fluid going through 900 nm, when in real life it is a matter of miliseconds. The velocity profile is extracted from a macro simulation, and because of this little zone being very near to the wall the inlet profile has very low velocity values. If I haven't been clear in some point, please ask me. 

Sponsored Links 
February 29, 2016, 13:30 

#2  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
sorry, could you better formulate the question? If you are working on laminar flat plate you have everywhere an analytical solution, apart the location x=0 that remains a singular point 

February 29, 2016, 13:37 

#3 
Senior Member
Jordi Pina
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 4 
Dear FMDenaro,
wonder a simulation like the image I posted. Which is nothing more than a submodelling of a macro simulation. Since the velocity is zero in the wall, the velocity is very little in my submodeling inlet (it is only 300nm height). This leads to the fact that the fluid goes very slow through my model. This is not coherent with the macro simulation, because such a little region is filled with fluid very fast. Should I try to explain it another way? 

February 29, 2016, 13:49 

#4  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
Still not clear for me... 1) considering nanofluidic physics, other effects are relevant that are disregarded in classic fluid dynamics 2) assuming to disregard any effect and using the classical fluid dynamic solution for a flat plate, you have a wellknow solution valid from y=0 up to y=+Inf, that is covering micro and macroregions 

February 29, 2016, 13:55 

#5 
Senior Member
Jordi Pina
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 4 
Dear FMDenaro,
I will explain you the whole context. I am tyring to simulate how a fluid fills a nanocavity. It is impossible to mesh the full model with a mesh with nanodetail and refining strategy gives bad results because it is not possible to have a mesh with mm size and nm size. Because of this, I'm carrying out a submodeling: I have carried out a macro simulation of the fluid filling my macro cavity. From this result, I interpolate the velocity of the fluid near the wall and carry out a simulation at the nanoscale with the geometry I have posted before. It turns out, that for filling the nanogeometry I need a lot of time, because I am using a velocity inlet with very low values, which are the values extracted from the macro simulation. This result doesn't fit the reality, because such a little region is fastly filled! But how can it be fastly filled if the velocity of the fluid near the wall is very low? 

February 29, 2016, 14:08 

#6 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
if you want to study the timedependent filling in a cavity, you must consider this region covered by two different fluids, taking into account the relative compressibility (In the nanofluidic you must also consider other effects).
Are you using the incompressible model? this would lead to an instantaneous propagation of the fluid velocity everywhere.. 

February 29, 2016, 14:17 

#7 
Senior Member
Jordi Pina
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 4 
I am using VOF simulation (polymer/air).
Related to compressibility, both polymer and air have a fixed density, so I understand I am not calculating any compressibility effect. Am I wrong? By the way, could you please tell me which other effects should I consider? 

February 29, 2016, 14:22 

#8  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
I am not an expert in nanofluidic but I know that some effects can be relevant such as capilarity, wallrugosity, etc... for example, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...90072911000603 

February 29, 2016, 14:27 

#9 
Senior Member
Jordi Pina
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 4 
FMDenaro,
A nanofluid is a fluid containing nanometersized particles, called nanoparticles. I am not simulating a nanofluid, but a normal fluid going through nanoscale cavities However, I still doesn't understand what is wrong in my submodeling approach... Do you see something conceptually wrong? 

February 29, 2016, 14:32 

#10  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
if you are within a classical fluid mechanics hypothesis and you are working on a flow over a straight wall with laminar condition, why don't you check your flow solution with an analytical one? particle are simply traced in a oneway model? I am sure someone more expert than me can suggest an idea for your model.. 

February 29, 2016, 14:54 

#11 
Senior Member
Jordi Pina
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 4 
I'll check so.
What do you mean with "particle are simply traced in a oneway model?"? 

February 29, 2016, 16:50 

#12 
Senior Member
Ahmed
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 11 
In the theory of classical fluid dynamics, the fluid velocity at a wall is that of the wall itself, known as the noslip condition, a direct consequence of the fluid viscosity [ write the definition of shear stress at walls and you will see that by yourself ].
In some specific conditions, you can introduce slip in your analysis so read the following thesis http://arxiv.org/pdf/1101.4421.pdf and you can google for [slip velocity of a fluid at a wall] good luck 

March 1, 2016, 05:09 

#13 
Senior Member
Jordi Pina
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 4 
Maybe I am not clear enough...
Wonder the flat plate model. The velocity at the wall is always zero, then: Why does the fluid touch the flat? I'm thinking in a transient analysis. 

March 1, 2016, 05:27 

#14  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,409
Rep Power: 39 
Quote:
In the limit of the continuous model (f.m.p. about 70 nm) you cannot use the continuous model but you have to come back to the particle (statistical) description of the medium. As I already wrote, if you work in nanofluidic (order of f.m.p.) you have to consider if the continuous model is suitable for your study! 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Difficulty in calculating angular velocity of Savonius turbine simulation  alfaruk  CFX  14  March 17, 2017 07:08 
in kepsilon wall function approach high Re turbulence models: question of velocity  romant  OpenFOAM Programming & Development  6  May 26, 2016 09:14 
interPhaseChangeFoam: velocity non zero at wall  alvariten  OpenFOAM PostProcessing  3  July 6, 2015 09:02 
Wall induced convection and fluid velocity, how?  hornig  FLUENT  0  January 25, 2010 14:06 
Multicomponent fluid  Andrea  CFX  2  October 11, 2004 05:12 
Sponsored Links 