CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   reynolds number for moving mesh (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/167869-reynolds-number-moving-mesh.html)

researcher March 10, 2016 12:53

reynolds number for moving mesh
 
hi everyone
can someone tell me, as to how to estimate the Re Number of a moving mesh problem. Since the Re number will determine whether the flow is laminar or turbulent, and therefore, whether to apply laminar NS equations or turbulent models etc, but the question is how to find it ? I dont think it should be based on the free stream velocity because the air next to the moving body should be moving faster than that !
pls help

agd March 10, 2016 14:17

What is the fluid velocity? As far as the Re number is concerned that is the velocity you want. As an example, consider flow over an airfoil. The airfoil is fixed and the fluid velocity is the speed of the fluid relative to the airfoil surface. Via a Galilean transformation the problem can also be solved by moving the airfoil through quiescent air. The fluid velocity used in the Re number calculation would still be the velocity of the fluid relative to the airfoil surface. Regardless of whether you use a moving mesh, there should be some physical velocity in your problem.

researcher March 10, 2016 14:25

Thank you agd for ur reply.
The flow field i am studying has a 1m/s inlet velocity, while the airfoil is oscillating at say 1 cps frequency.

agd March 10, 2016 16:18

So how would you compute the fluid velocity seen by an observer fixed to the airfoil?

researcher March 10, 2016 21:25

Well, it is changing continuously. Since it is moving sinusoidally, the velocity is a function of time. This is what confuses me. How to compute the reynolds number.

agd March 11, 2016 10:35

When you talk about the Re number remember that there is not a single Re number for a problem. If you are looking for a figure of merit to compare to other problems, you could use the mean velocity of the flow, or you could use the approach velocity (in this case the inlet velocity). Either of these would be reasonable values for computation of a y+ for grid generation. For comparison to experiment I would defer to how the quantity is defined in the experiment.

researcher March 11, 2016 18:49

Thank you for reply agd.
I figure one may make any velocity as reference and then go on refining until mesh independence is achieved. M i right?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17.