|
[Sponsors] |
January 11, 2000, 02:48 |
comparison of CFD & WT
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am mainly involved in the validation work. I found that the Cn, Cm values are within 5% to the Wind Tunnel. But the drag is "OFF". The main problem is in Base Drag estimation. I have tried various TURBULENCE MODELS without success. If any one of you have successfully matched the drag coefficient, please contact me. Any suggestions about the selection of TURBULENCE MODEL to simulate wake,would be helpful. I am using 10 degree cone as the standard shape.
|
|
January 11, 2000, 13:13 |
Re: comparison of CFD & WT
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
you may find that your results are quite typical. i was told by one of my professors that he never saw navier stokes drag predications that were good. typically lift and moment which are aminly due to pressure forces are good but the drag is usually off. many turbulence models were developed for stream line bodies so they probably won't be good for your cone. hopefully others will respond so you and i can see their tips.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD Design...The CFD Future | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 20 | November 19, 2015 23:40 |
comparison of CFD results with reality | chouer | CFX | 0 | October 31, 2005 13:30 |
PC vs. Workstation | Tim Franke | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 29, 1999 15:01 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS CFD SIMULATION APPROACHS OF REACTIVE TURBULENT FLOWS | mounir | Main CFD Forum | 4 | March 3, 1999 12:07 |