CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Help with pressure gradient calculation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 6, 2016, 17:03
Default Help with pressure gradient calculation
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
akus is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I am quite ignorant of fluid mechanics, so I was hoping someone on this forum would be able to at least point me in the right direction on this question. This question really relates to vacuum chambers and the gas flow between them, but the pressure regime which I'm doing this work in is in the viscous/knudsen flow range (...I think). So, I'm hoping some fluid mechanics expert will be able to help me out.

The situation I'm interested in is the following. There are two chambers held at constant pressures. For example, chamber 1 is held at 50 mTorr, while chamber 2 is held at 0.2 mTorr. The two chambers are separated by an orifice of 3mm. Now, the mean free path for air at 50 mTorr is about 1.5 mm, which puts the knudsen number, in regards to the aperature at 0.5. I read somewhere that a knudsen number < 1 is a viscous/knudsen flow, which is why I believe the physics I need is in that regime. I realize that in regards to the entire chamber it would still be molecular flow, but I'm really more interested with whats going on near the aperture.

What I'm wondering is if there is any analytical way of calculating the pressure gradient between the two chambers. There is some volumetric flow between the two chambers (at the speed of sound), so I would think that there is some P(x) that describes the pressure in each chamber. For example, my intuition would say that just past the aperture into chamber 1, the pressure is something less than what it is in the bulk of the chamber (30 mTorr). Over some distance the pressure would increase up to the bulk pressure. Is this intuition correct? Is there a way to calculate this?

If someone could at least point me in the right direction I would be very grateful.

Thanks
akus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 6, 2016, 18:04
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Unfortunately, your problem touches the limits of the continuum hypothesis and the definition of a "pressure gradient" is not well suited.
I suggest to see specific textbook for rarefied gas (e.g. see http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs...rnalCode=fluid)
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2016, 04:46
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9
engio is on a distinguished road
Maybe you should try Molflow+(http://test-molflow.web.cern.ch/).
I have modeled etch chamber(process pressure around 20mTorr, chamber size is for 300mm wafer) and simulated with Molflow, compared the pressure with the measurement from the actual equipment. The simulated pressure was ~12mTorr or so, where the measurement was 11.2mTorr or so. Quite surprised to have such a close values...
engio is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pressure gradient of a 2D periodic flow problem Honey FLUENT 1 October 17, 2012 06:06
Rotating Reference Frame Pressure Gradient clac FLUENT 0 August 22, 2012 18:20
vortex cause pressure gradient or pressure gradient induce vortex? fruitkiwi Main CFD Forum 4 June 12, 2012 01:12
Neumann pressure BC and velocity field Antech Main CFD Forum 0 April 25, 2006 02:15
Gas pressure question Dan Moskal Main CFD Forum 0 October 24, 2002 22:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11.