# Discrete Phase Modeling for Nanofluids

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 22, 2016, 02:08 Discrete Phase Modeling for Nanofluids #1 New Member     Aarthy Meena Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Trichy Posts: 29 Rep Power: 4 Hi all, I am trying to model natural convection heat transfer of nanofluids inside a square cavity using DPM method. I have following queries regarding that 1) How to convert volume fraction of nanoparticles to number of parcels in case of group injections? For eg: if I want to use 2% volume fraction of nanoparticles of 30 nm diameter, how to create injections for this case? 2) As it is natural convection, initially I need to define a uniform distribution of nanoparticles through out the flow domain. I strongly believe that, experts here can clarify my doubts. Thank You. __________________ Aarthy, PG Student, National Institute of Technology, Trichy, India.

 June 22, 2016, 07:54 #2 Senior Member   Michael Prinkey Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Pittsburgh PA Posts: 358 Rep Power: 17 (1) To provide fix volume fraction at an inlet requires that both phases enter at the same inlet in relative volume proportions. That is just simple algebra. You may need to think if there is a slip velocity between the two phases, but the starting point should be to assume the particle and fluid share the same velocity. (2) You will need to a patch in DPM particles in the flow. But, you will not know the fluid or particle velcocities before hand, so you will potentially have settling issues as the convection develops. You might be just as well off to start with no initial particles and just run the simulation until it reaches the target volume fraction. Note that if you have an outlet (with or without a screen) and a particle inlet, you cannot enforce a full field average volume fraction. Even if you have no outlet, if you have a particle injection, the particle population will grow with time. If the cavity is truly closed and you are seek steady state results, I'd question your rationale about using particle injections at all. Just do initial particle distributions at your target volume fraction and iterate until steady state...or at least until you can time average a transient window.

June 23, 2016, 00:57
#3
New Member

Aarthy Meena
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Trichy
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 4
Quote:
 Originally Posted by mprinkey (1) To provide fix volume fraction at an inlet requires that both phases enter at the same inlet in relative volume proportions. That is just simple algebra. You may need to think if there is a slip velocity between the two phases, but the starting point should be to assume the particle and fluid share the same velocity. (2) You will need to a patch in DPM particles in the flow. But, you will not know the fluid or particle velcocities before hand, so you will potentially have settling issues as the convection develops. You might be just as well off to start with no initial particles and just run the simulation until it reaches the target volume fraction. Note that if you have an outlet (with or without a screen) and a particle inlet, you cannot enforce a full field average volume fraction. Even if you have no outlet, if you have a particle injection, the particle population will grow with time. If the cavity is truly closed and you are seek steady state results, I'd question your rationale about using particle injections at all. Just do initial particle distributions at your target volume fraction and iterate until steady state...or at least until you can time average a transient window.
Dear Sir,

I completely understood the point 2 of your post. Thanks for giving deep insights.

Sir, Can you please elaborate more on point 1. For eg: Let us take a scenario of flow around a circular cylinder in cylindrical coordinates with forced flow in laminar steady regime. I need a 2% volume fraction nanofluid to flow.

1) How will I decide the type of injection? single or surface or group.
2) How will I control the number of parcels, so that my volume fraction requirement is met out?

Sorry, I understand that you said it is a simple algebra. But, it will be helpful if you can give some more hints or a reference material which will be helpful in understanding these concepts.

Thank you once again.
__________________
Aarthy,
PG Student,
National Institute of Technology, Trichy, India.

 June 23, 2016, 08:26 #4 Senior Member   Michael Prinkey Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Pittsburgh PA Posts: 358 Rep Power: 17 Volume fraction is defined as the fraction of the total volume occupied by a given phase. You can compute the volume of a sphere for a given particle radius, right? And the number of particles times that particle volume divided by the total volume. That is all it takes. The details will depend on your particular solver input.

June 24, 2016, 01:35
#5
New Member

Aarthy Meena
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Trichy
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 4
Quote:
 Originally Posted by mprinkey Volume fraction is defined as the fraction of the total volume occupied by a given phase. You can compute the volume of a sphere for a given particle radius, right? And the number of particles times that particle volume divided by the total volume. That is all it takes. The details will depend on your particular solver input.
Dear Sir,

Thank you so much for your kind reply. I will update you with the progress. Thank You :-)
__________________
Aarthy,
PG Student,
National Institute of Technology, Trichy, India.

 Tags dpm fluent, nanofluid modelling

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post tymcme FLUENT 5 March 30, 2016 00:49 hamid z FLUENT 0 September 26, 2015 15:26 shashwatb Fluent Multiphase 0 June 16, 2015 09:55 Rodrigo FLUENT 3 June 3, 2004 10:52 Chris FLUENT 0 November 20, 2000 14:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31.