CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Cp plot wiggles simplefoam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 3, 2016, 14:23
Default Cp plot wiggles simplefoam
  #1
New Member
 
D Singh
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
diwakarsingh64 is on a distinguished road
hello everyone,

I am simulating a simple NACA 23012 3d wing at an angle of attack 8 deg...using simpleFoam. Reynolds number of around .25 million. Cl and Cd values turning out to be fine. Its the Cp plot wiggles around the leading edge that is the problem. Could it be over/under resolution of the mesh. Or is it owing to the geometry curve created by the icem when coordinates are imported. I have attached an image with it to show where exactly are wiggles existing.
kindest regards
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CP45.jpg (44.0 KB, 23 views)
diwakarsingh64 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2016, 11:32
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Troy Snyder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 18
tas38 is on a distinguished road
What is the grid resolution around the wing and how did you extract the pressure curve?
tas38 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2016, 12:27
Default
  #3
New Member
 
D Singh
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
diwakarsingh64 is on a distinguished road
hello tas

y+ around the wing is of 1 (prism) and for pressure curve in tecplot surface slice on wing and then x-y plot in a new tiled frame.
kind regards
D singh
diwakarsingh64 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2016, 12:29
Default
  #4
New Member
 
D Singh
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
diwakarsingh64 is on a distinguished road
sorry another question, If one puts first cell outside the buffer layer not resolving the subviscous layer, does that result in wiggles in cp ?! if yes then why so?
kind regards
diwakarsingh64 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2016, 13:20
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Troy Snyder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 18
tas38 is on a distinguished road
Your y+ value is small such that you are actually resolving the viscous sublayer. If you are using (standard) wall functions, you should reduce the grid density to get a value around 30. If you are using enhanced wall functions the value is fine. Also, what is the grid density in the streamwise direction (approximate number of grid points along the upper and lower surfaces of the wing) and the ratio of grid sizes normal to the wing?
tas38 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2016, 14:28
Default
  #6
New Member
 
D Singh
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
diwakarsingh64 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your reply. In case if there is anything wrong with the grid sizing or the resolution I wonder why the wigles are present only on the upper surface. And sorry I didnt understand what you meant when u said that I am resolving sub-viscous layer. That is the reason why I chose yplus to be 1 since I want to resolve boundary layer completely. And how would using wall fuction(thereby increasing the yplus to 30 or 60 depending upon the model) will eliminate the wiggles. Sorry if I am missing some physics in here. Would be grateful to learn it.
kindest regards
diwakarsingh64 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 6, 2016, 15:29
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Troy Snyder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 18
tas38 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by diwakarsingh64 View Post
Thanks for your reply. In case if there is anything wrong with the grid sizing or the resolution I wonder why the wigles are present only on the upper surface. And sorry I didnt understand what you meant when u said that I am resolving sub-viscous layer. That is the reason why I chose yplus to be 1 since I want to resolve boundary layer completely. And how would using wall fuction(thereby increasing the yplus to 30 or 60 depending upon the model) will eliminate the wiggles. Sorry if I am missing some physics in here. Would be grateful to learn it.
kindest regards
I see wiggles on both the upper and lower (less pronounced) surfaces. Could you post a picture of the zoomed-in picture of the wing and grid near the leading edge? Also, is your solution converged and by what criteria?
tas38 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
interFoam vs. simpleFoam channel flow comparison DanM OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 January 31, 2020 15:26
SimpleFOAM how to plot the real pressures (not adimensionalized by density) alsdia OpenFOAM Post-Processing 4 June 10, 2016 05:35
[swak4Foam] Foam warnings - related to swak4Foam Salam-H OpenFOAM Community Contributions 20 August 2, 2015 15:40
simpleFoam parallel solver & Fluent polyhedral mesh Zlatko OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 September 26, 2014 06:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:49.