CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Transient analysis with variable time step AcuConsole

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By hellorishi

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 29, 2016, 03:06
Default Transient analysis with variable time step AcuConsole
  #1
New Member
 
Andrea
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
Andrea_Formartis is on a distinguished road
Hey guys,

I am new to this forum and I would like to know if anyone has ever used AcuConsole for some CFD analysis.
Is it possible to setup a transient simulation with a variable time step?
I ask because I am facing the problem of an opening valve: the first few instants of the simulation are very important and I would need a very small time step to reach a good time resolution.
However, after few seconds, such a small time step becomes useless and I would like to increase it, in order to save space disk and simulation time.
The AcuConsole interface does not seem to support this function, has anyone ever done anything similar with it?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Best Regards,

Andrea
Andrea_Formartis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 30, 2016, 01:41
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Rishi .
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17
hellorishi is on a distinguished road
Hi Andreas,
One option here would be run the first part of the simulation with small time steps. Then use a restart for the second part with coarser time steps.
Another option is to use automatic time steps. I would prefer the first option.
iancmlositano likes this.
hellorishi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2017, 11:17
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Ian Carlo M. Lositaņo
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Legazpi City, Philippines
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 9
iancmlositano is on a distinguished road
Mr. Rishi, changing from small to bigger time steps, will the simulation run time be significantly reduced? And I would like to follow up asking if the more refine the time step - more decimal places to the right - the slower the computation, thus longer computing time?

Sent from my HUAWEI TIT-U02 using CFD Online Forum mobile app
iancmlositano is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2017, 07:57
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Rishi .
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 17
hellorishi is on a distinguished road
Yes that is correct.
With small time step (e.g. 0.01 sec) you will need substantial amount of time for the entire simulation.
With larger time step (e.g. 10 sec) simulation time will be drastically reduced.

Although AcuSolve is stable at higher CFL numbers and does not need CFL<1 for stability, you have to also take into consideration, what kind of physics is involved and whether the time stepping is making sense for the phenomenon you would like to capture.
hellorishi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multiple floating objects CKH OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 February 20, 2019 09:08
High Courant Number @ icoFoam Artex85 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 February 16, 2017 13:40
Stuck in a Rut- interDyMFoam! xoitx OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 March 25, 2016 07:09
Help for the small implementation in turbulence model shipman OpenFOAM Programming & Development 25 March 19, 2014 10:08
plot over time fferroni OpenFOAM Post-Processing 7 June 8, 2012 07:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26.