
[Sponsors] 
March 28, 2017, 05:10 
Problem in heat transfer IBM model

#1 
New Member

Hi everyone!
I am developing the IBM (immerse boundary method) for incompressible flow with heat transfer model, and i have a problem when simulate a validation case as shown in the picture of the cross section of domain: https://goo.gl/photos/9iu3dR8ZWhAyTASX9 The temperature decreases lower than 20oC and may be negative if i run with coarse mesh. i have refined the mesh, and the temperature still lower than 20 at that area. i know that is the instability area. but i do not know how to fix this problem, because i only have a little experience in heat transfer. please help me! many thanks. 

March 28, 2017, 05:27 

#2 
Senior Member

Well... there might be an infinite number of causes for this, the specific IBM implementation being only one of these. You should give more details.
In general, a temperature out of bounds is generated by some non bounded interpolation (either in the scheme or in the ibm interpolations). But there might be a bug anywhere. I would exclude the instabilty as cause, unless it actually leads to the case blowup. 

March 28, 2017, 11:21 

#3  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,696
Rep Power: 60 
Quote:
Does your code works in a flow problem without any IB body? How about the discretization of the internal energy equation? 

March 28, 2017, 23:05 

#4  
New Member

Quote:
Hi sbaffini! Thank you for your supported. These pictures are detail information of my case: https://goo.gl/photos/FhZUDyz3zqgSLASp7 This is the domain in IBM method:  Green field: fluid (only solve this field).  Red field: solid.  Blue line: Forcing points.  Black line: immerse boundary. The grid point size is about 0.13 mm. I use LES Smagorinsky turbulence model. My model use both forcing and ghostcell points. The interpolation and extrapolation are in first order (3 points). And here is the solved temperature field: https://goo.gl/photos/FzvCKzDDQfw9NNfQ7 I have rescaled from 19.5 to 20.5 oC to see the low temperature points. Thanks! 

March 28, 2017, 23:25 

#5  
New Member

Quote:
Thank you for your reply! My code use FVM (finite volume method) for spatial discretization and MacCormack predictorcorrector for temporal scheme. My code had validated with many case, include none IBM and IBM, such as, Channel flow, Periodic hill, Wavy flow, Tube, Echangeur, ...vv. This problem occur when i simulate a geometry that have a corrner like this case. 

March 29, 2017, 03:03 

#6  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,696
Rep Power: 60 
Quote:
From the temperature field it seems more a numerical instability, not a problem due to the corner. The static Smagorinsky model add further viscosity and conducibility so that you need to consider the time step value based on the viscous stability constraint. Reduce your time step but I suggest to run a case without SGS model. 

March 29, 2017, 03:43 

#7 
Senior Member

I have to take back what I said before, this looks like a genuine instability to me too.
However, if you always have problems with sharp corners, that might be something to look at closely. What do you mean by forcing AND ghost cells? Could you explain more? I am also confused by the fact that you use forcing in mesh points (the blue line) but you use a FV method. One thing I can think of is that, as you actually have a field also within the body, in sharp corners (and in many other cases) you might end up having the same red cell which has to provide values for 2 really different neighbor green fluid cells. How do you handle that? 

March 29, 2017, 05:37 

#8 
New Member


March 29, 2017, 10:44 

#9 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,696
Rep Power: 60 
Could you post the temperature field for this improved solution?
Consider that: 1) the static SGS Smagorinsky model require a constant as input. How about the value you fixed? 2) In no way you can perform a LES using a first order upwind discretization. 

March 29, 2017, 11:49 

#10  
Senior Member
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 980
Rep Power: 25 
Quote:
the symmetry BC is not possible here. 

March 29, 2017, 22:37 

#11  
New Member

Quote:
here are the Temperature fields of the case (DX = 0.13mm, DT = 2e5 s) https://goo.gl/photos/GCs6pxjvYUPNmLq9A and case ((DX = 0.09mm, DT = 1e5 s) https://goo.gl/photos/fVzb8wapVSwyWRxF6 I use fixes value of Cs = 0.1 and Prt = 0.71. Should I continue decrease the time step or increase the mesh resolution? 

March 30, 2017, 00:09 

#13  
Senior Member
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 980
Rep Power: 25 
Quote:
What you have is geometric symmetry and not flow symmetry. You can not have flux across the symmetry condition that is there shall be no flow across it. You have an inlet perpendicular to it on the right side. That is bound to cause flow crossing that symmetry BC. So your problem is not well defined from CFD point of view. 

March 30, 2017, 02:39 

#14 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,696
Rep Power: 60 
To be clear, using LES no 2D hypothesis, no symmetry conditions must be used!


Tags 
heat transfer modelling, ibm, incompressible flows 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Heat Transfer Problem in FLUENT  eng_yasser_2020  FLUENT  3  February 19, 2019 02:13 
Problem with total heat transfer rate  aswathy_raghu  FLUENT  0  July 26, 2016 07:39 
Closed Domain Buoyancy Flow Problem  Madhatter92  CFX  6  June 20, 2016 21:05 
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids  ashtonJ  CFX  6  August 11, 2014 14:32 
Water vapour condensation in CFX5.7.1  hdj  CFX  1  November 27, 2005 07:15 