CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

viscous validation cases

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 20, 2017, 03:03
Default viscous validation cases
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 239
Rep Power: 16
naffrancois is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

I implemented in a finite volume code full implicit and imex semi-implicit schemes for the NS equations at present without any turbulence model. I am looking for 2D/3D laminar viscous validation cases, apart from circular cylinder and flat plate that would show the gain of implicit time integration, especially for imex. Any idea will be greatly appreciated !

Cheers
naffrancois is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2017, 03:16
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,763
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by naffrancois View Post
Dear all,

I implemented in a finite volume code full implicit and imex semi-implicit schemes for the NS equations at present without any turbulence model. I am looking for 2D/3D laminar viscous validation cases, apart from circular cylinder and flat plate that would show the gain of implicit time integration, especially for imex. Any idea will be greatly appreciated !

Cheers

This is an exact solution https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/434...00ac52c18e.pdf

I suggest to simulate also the backward facing-step and the lid-driven cavity as wall-bounded laminar flows
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2017, 07:31
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 239
Rep Power: 16
naffrancois is on a distinguished road
Thank you FDenaro for these suggestions. I forgot to mention that I am dealing with the compressible NSE, so I think the lid-driven cavity test would be difficult without preconditionning.
naffrancois is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2017, 07:43
Default Search for wind turbine cases
  #4
Member
 
A. S.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Raipur (INDIA)
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17
apoorv is on a distinguished road
Search for low Reynolds number wind turbine airfoil case, that may laminar. Hoping that you are working on Preconditioned solver or a compressible solver that can work on mach 0.1.
apoorv is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2017, 09:00
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,763
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by naffrancois View Post
Thank you FDenaro for these suggestions. I forgot to mention that I am dealing with the compressible NSE, so I think the lid-driven cavity test would be difficult without preconditionning.

laminar flows are characterized by low Re number and that often implies low Mach number, without preconditioning the system is difficult to solve any of these cases
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2017, 02:47
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 239
Rep Power: 16
naffrancois is on a distinguished road
I see, it makes sense. No chance to find a realistic transonic case in laminar regime I guess. Thank you for your answers
naffrancois is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2017, 11:23
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,763
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by naffrancois View Post
I see, it makes sense. No chance to find a realistic transonic case in laminar regime I guess. Thank you for your answers

Well, some special airfoil profile have laminar design (at moderate Mach number)..You could try to search for some database...
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2017, 20:37
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,273
Rep Power: 34
arjun will become famous soon enougharjun will become famous soon enough
removing the post as code was not properly attached.
arjun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2017, 20:40
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,273
Rep Power: 34
arjun will become famous soon enougharjun will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
Well, some special airfoil profile have laminar design (at moderate Mach number)..You could try to search for some database...

Code for the attached paper.
Attached Files
File Type: c RossEthier.c (21.5 KB, 7 views)
arjun is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Viscous forces (interDyMFoam) differ between OF 2.0 and later versions maxof OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 May 30, 2013 04:17
Re: Validation Cases for Turrbomachinery suneesh Main CFD Forum 6 October 7, 2005 03:03
Cases validation prasat Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2003 09:14
Standard CFD test cases? Damon Qualski Main CFD Forum 1 April 10, 2003 14:10
Compressible Viscous Code vaidation test cases? Mohammad Kermani Main CFD Forum 2 November 11, 1999 14:22


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:58.