CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

implicit-explicit methods and operating splitting

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 7, 2017, 12:00
Default implicit-explicit methods and operating splitting
  #1
Senior Member
 
Selig
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 213
Rep Power: 10
selig5576 is on a distinguished road
According to Gilbert Strang's book, Computational Science and Engineering, he defines a scheme that implicitly treats the viscous terms and explicitly treats the advections terms, i.e.

Step 1: Advection
\frac{u^{*} - u^{n}}{dt} = - \mathbf{u} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{u}

Step 2: Diffusion
\frac{u^{**} - u^{*}}{dt} = \nu \nabla^{2} \mathbf{u}

Step 3: Solve PPE (SOR method, CG, ...)
Step 4: Corrector step
\frac{u^{n} - u^{**}}{dt} = \frac{1}{\rho} \left(\frac{P_{i+1,j} - P_{i-1,j}}{2 dx}\right)

In effect, its a standard Chorin-Projection method but with operator splitting for the advection and diffusion terms. My question is, are there disadvantages to performing operator splitting as described? I've seen that AB2-CN IMEX method doesnt seem to decouple advection and diffusion.
selig5576 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2017, 12:10
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,764
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
There are no practical advantages in doing a splitting between convection and diffusion in the momentum equation.
The splitting can have advantage in reaction-diffusion equations where the characteristic time of the diffusion is some order of magnitude greater than that of the reaction.
Some advantage can be possible in the splitting of the Laplace operator in three 1d problems.
selig5576 likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2017, 12:18
Default Operator splitting
  #3
Senior Member
 
Selig
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 213
Rep Power: 10
selig5576 is on a distinguished road
Thank you for the info. In an unstructured grid, would operator splitting still hold? I know that the ADI method can't be applied to unstructured grids, which makes me think that applying the TDMA for each direction would not hold? Mathematically, the operator splitting is elegant.
selig5576 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2017, 12:38
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,764
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by selig5576 View Post
Thank you for the info. In an unstructured grid, would operator splitting still hold? I know that the ADI method can't be applied to unstructured grids, which makes me think that applying the TDMA for each direction would not hold? Mathematically, the operator splitting is elegant.

From a mathematical point of view you can always write the Laplacian as a product of 1D operators along x and y (and z in 3D) but on unstructured grid you have some problem in using the differential equation instead of the integral one.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Operating Temperature Evolution Methods around Electronics Units GorkemAtay FLUENT 0 June 22, 2016 02:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:42.